Loading…
Lest We Forget: A Critical Analysis of Bioterrorist Incidents, National Exercises, and U.S. Prevention, Response and Recovery Strategies
Current U.S. deterrence and prevention strategies are incapable of completely negating the multiple means a terrorist has to obtain and disseminate biological agents to create a catastrophic U.S. incident. However, a thorough analysis of previous biological attacks and incidents and national bioterr...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Current U.S. deterrence and prevention strategies are incapable of completely negating the multiple means a terrorist has to obtain and disseminate biological agents to create a catastrophic U.S. incident. However, a thorough analysis of previous biological attacks and incidents and national bioterrorism exercises may provide insights into where the most effective deterrence and prevention strategies should be focused to prevent or mitigate a large-scale biological terrorist attack. The analysis also will provide insights into how we should respond and recover if an attack occurs. This paper reviews and analyzes biological incidents that have occurred over the past 30 years, including the Rajneesh Cult salmonella poisoning, Larry Wayne Harris's purchase of plague bacteria, the Aum Shinrikyo Cult anthrax dissemination, and the anthrax letter attacks of 2001. Additionally, National Exercises that involved simulated bioterrorist events are analyzed: TOPOFF 1, 2, and 3, and Dark Winter. Next, current U.S. strategies and policies aimed to prevent a biological weapons attack are examined to determine what focus will achieve the best effect in light of lessons learned from the biological incidents and exercises reviewed. Based on an examination of these real-world events and national exercises, the following are presented as key points of focus that U.S. policy makers should consider more carefully: (1) improve the detection of bio-attacks; and (2) prepare against biological contingencies, respond effectively, recover quickly and capably, and gather biological-weapon forensics information so that decision-makers can attribute the attack to the correct perpetrators.
Counterproliferation Paper No. 50. |
---|