Loading…
“I Got it on Ebay!”: cost-effective approach to surgical skills labs
Abstract Background Surgical education is witnessing a surge in the use of simulation. However, implementation of simulation is often cost-prohibitive. Online shopping offers a low budget alternative. The aim of this study is to implement cost-effective skills labs and analyze online versus manufact...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of surgical research 2016 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Background Surgical education is witnessing a surge in the use of simulation. However, implementation of simulation is often cost-prohibitive. Online shopping offers a low budget alternative. The aim of this study is to implement cost-effective skills labs and analyze online versus manufacturers’ prices to evaluate for savings. Materials and Methods Four skills labs were designed for the surgery clerkship from July 2014 to June 2015. Skills labs were implemented using hand built simulation and instruments purchased online. Trademarked simulation were priced online and instruments priced from a manufacturer. Costs were compiled, and a descriptive cost analysis of online and manufacturers’ prices was performed. Learners rated their level of satisfaction for all educational activities, and levels of satisfaction were compared. Results 119 third year medical students participated. Supply lists and costs were compiled for each lab. A descriptive cost analysis of online and manufacturers’ prices showed online prices were substantially lower than manufacturers, with a per lab savings of: $1779.26 (suturing), $1752.52 (chest tube), $2448.52 (anastomosis), and $1891.64 (laparoscopic), resulting in a year 1 savings of $47,285. Mean student satisfaction scores for the skills labs were 4.32, with statistical significance compared to live lectures at 2.96 ( P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4804 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.017 |