Effectiveness of a separate training center for peritoneal dialysis patients

• Published in: Saudi journal of kidney diseases and transplantation 2008-07, Vol.19 (4), p.574-582
• Main Authors: al-Harbi, Ali, al-Shaebi, Fuad, al-Kanhal, Fahd, Musa, Fatimah Muhsin, Wahdan, Iyad Y., Shahin, Faysal A. M., Suqiyyah, Muhammad Ziyad, al-Wakil, Jamal S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Ambulatory; Analysis; Automation; Chronic kidney disease; Chronic renal failure; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Patient Education as Topic; Peritoneal dialysis; Peritoneal Dialysis - methods; Peritoneal Dialysis - statistics & numerical data; Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory - methods; Renal Dialysis - statistics & numerical data; Saudi Arabia; Teaching - methods; الأمراض; الأمراض المزمنة; الفشل الكلوي; الكلى; المرضى; غسيل الكلى البريتوني
• ISSN: 1319-2442; 2320-3838

The aim of this study is to analyze the patients' database of the Baxter's Training Peritoneal Dialysis Program (BTPDP) adopted at the Baxter Renal Education Center (BREC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in order to determine its effectiveness in the management, compliance, and outcome of the trained peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The study analyzes the database of the BTPDP, which includes the demographic data, duration of follow-up, complications, and outcome of the patients trained on PD between September 2003 and November 2007. Records of 376 patients with a mean age of 46.0 ± 22.6 years were available in the database for analysis. Of them, 187 (49.7%) were males, 312 (82.9%) were trained at the BREC, 315 (83.8%) were new PD patients, and 298 (79.3%) were trained on automated PD (APD). The dropouts during the study period included 172 patients (46%); 42 (24.4%) were transplanted, 45 (26.2%) switched to hemodialysis, 57 (33.1%) died and 28 (16.3%) were lost to follow-up. A comparison was made between the group trained at the BREC and the group trained at the hospital. There was an overwhelming adoption of BTPDP by the different hospitals during the study period (p < 0.00001). There were 264 (84.6%) patients trained on APD at the BREC vs. 34 (53.1%) at the hospital (p < 0.00001), and the patients trained at the BREC had significantly less dropouts than those trained at the hospital during the study period 135 (43.3%) vs. 38 (59.4%) respectively (p < 0.02). The mean period of follow-up was significantly different between the patients trained at the BREC and those trained at the referring hospital (390 ± 461 days vs. 679 ± 779 days respectively (p < 00000.8). Also, there was a trend for better technique survival after the second year, among the patients trained at the BREC. We conclude that the BREC model has increased the recruitment to PD, and helped in spreading this method of renal replacement therapy among patients. This model emphasizes the role of a designated training course by an expert team, and unifies the training standards. Furthermore, application of this model can be expanded nationwide and even to other countries.