Operationalising resilience in tropical agricultural value chains

Purpose The analysis of the concept of resilience in supply chain management studies mostly focuses on the downstream side of the value chain and tacitly assumes an unlimited supply of raw materials. This assumption is unreasonable for agricultural value chains, as upstream disruptions clearly have...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Supply chain management 2019-03, Vol.24 (2), p.271-300
Main Authors: Aboah, Joshua, Wilson, Mark M.J, Rich, Karl M, Lyne, Michael C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agricultural commodities
Agricultural practices
Citation analysis
Collaboration
Efficiency
Flexibility
Food supply
Keywords
Knowledge management
Literature reviews
Logistics
Network analysis
Raw materials
Resilience
Science
Suppliers
Supply chain management
Supply chains
Upstream
Value analysis
Value chain
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose The analysis of the concept of resilience in supply chain management studies mostly focuses on the downstream side of the value chain and tacitly assumes an unlimited supply of raw materials. This assumption is unreasonable for agricultural value chains, as upstream disruptions clearly have a material impact on the availability of raw materials, and indeed, are a common source of supply problems. This paper aims to present a framework for the operationalisation of the concept of socioecological resilience in agricultural value chains that incorporates upstream activities. Design/methodology/approach A citation network analysis was adopted to review articles. A conceptual framework is then advanced to identify elements of resilience and indicators relevant to tropical agricultural value chains. Findings There are limited studies that assess resilience in the food chain context. Flexibility, collaboration, adaptability and resourcefulness are key elements for assessing resilience at the individual chain actor level. However, the paper argues that adaptability is the relevant element for the assessment of resilience at an aggregate food system level because it considers the alteration of a system’s state of resilience. Practical implications The proposed framework and propositions accommodate stakeholder interactions in the value chain and could serve as a tool to guide the assessment of resilience in agricultural value chains. Originality/value This paper is one of the few to extend resilience to cover the socioecological interaction aspects for supply chains that yield the raw materials needed for continuity in channel-wide value creation processes.
ISSN:1359-8546
1758-6852
DOI:10.1108/SCM-05-2018-0204