Loading…

Reading posthumanism and decolonisation diffractively towards (re)configuring an ontoepistemic approach to religion education

Student-teachers are exposed to different approaches to teaching Religion Education in South Africa. Amongst these have been the phenomenological-reflective-dialogical approach of Cornelia Roux and the empathetic-reflective-dialogical approach of Janet Jarvis. These different approaches made immeasu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of religious education 2021-01, Vol.43 (1), p.80-90
Main Authors: du Preez, Petro, Simmonds, Shan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-fb3a6e2edd882b375bba2000faa020e2616177792ae1df349078253bedf6adbb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-fb3a6e2edd882b375bba2000faa020e2616177792ae1df349078253bedf6adbb3
container_end_page 90
container_issue 1
container_start_page 80
container_title British journal of religious education
container_volume 43
creator du Preez, Petro
Simmonds, Shan
description Student-teachers are exposed to different approaches to teaching Religion Education in South Africa. Amongst these have been the phenomenological-reflective-dialogical approach of Cornelia Roux and the empathetic-reflective-dialogical approach of Janet Jarvis. These different approaches made immeasurable contributions as they started to shift how Religion Education has been taught. The approaches are both informed by a social constructivist methodology, which riposte previous traditionalist approaches. This article questions whether these approaches, amidst the decolonial turn and the posthuman predicament, are still germane as they tend to separate ontology from epistemology. A diffractive reading of posthumanist theory and decolonial literature enabled us to bring texts in intra-action so as to problematise the colonial, capitalist and patriarchal character of existing approaches to Religion Education, both ontologically and epistemologically. This remains pivotal for a country like South Africa where colonial epistemicide prevails despite it being vehemently challenged. Our aim is to weave a text(ile), an ontoepstemic approach, to (re)configure Religion Education in support of the transformative potential of the decolonial project in South Africa. In our pursuit of ontoepistemic justice, we advocate for decolonising the Religion Education curriculum, understood as a verb, as (1) a means to critical empowerment and as (2) a complex encounter with entangled, embedded knowledges.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01416200.2020.1809993
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1277808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1277808</ericid><sourcerecordid>2464335074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-fb3a6e2edd882b375bba2000faa020e2616177792ae1df349078253bedf6adbb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9v1DAQxS0EEkvhI1SyxAUOKWM7Gyc3UFUoqBISgrM18Z-tq8QOtkO1B747Trdw5GSN5703Mz9CzhlcMOjhHbCWdRzgggOvXz0MwyCekB2TLTRyEOwp2W2aZhM9Jy9yvgMQrO1hR35_s2h8ONAl5nK7zhh8nikGQ43VcYq1xOJjoMY7l1AX_8tOR1riPSaT6Ztk3-oYnD-saUvBQGMo0S4-Fzt7TXFZUkR9Wx002ckftixrVv2Q-pI8czhl--rxPSM_Pl59v7xubr5--nz54abRooPSuFFgZ7k1pu_5KOR-HLGeAg6xXmx5xzompRw4WmacaAeQPd-L0RrXoRlHcUZen3LrMj9Xm4u6i2sKdaTibdcKsQfZVtX-pNIp5pysU0vyM6ajYqA20uovabWRVo-kq-_85LPJ63-eqy-MS9lDX_vvT30fXEwz3sc0GVXwOMVUmQbtsxL_H_EHKO-Rvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464335074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reading posthumanism and decolonisation diffractively towards (re)configuring an ontoepistemic approach to religion education</title><source>ERIC</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>du Preez, Petro ; Simmonds, Shan</creator><creatorcontrib>du Preez, Petro ; Simmonds, Shan</creatorcontrib><description>Student-teachers are exposed to different approaches to teaching Religion Education in South Africa. Amongst these have been the phenomenological-reflective-dialogical approach of Cornelia Roux and the empathetic-reflective-dialogical approach of Janet Jarvis. These different approaches made immeasurable contributions as they started to shift how Religion Education has been taught. The approaches are both informed by a social constructivist methodology, which riposte previous traditionalist approaches. This article questions whether these approaches, amidst the decolonial turn and the posthuman predicament, are still germane as they tend to separate ontology from epistemology. A diffractive reading of posthumanist theory and decolonial literature enabled us to bring texts in intra-action so as to problematise the colonial, capitalist and patriarchal character of existing approaches to Religion Education, both ontologically and epistemologically. This remains pivotal for a country like South Africa where colonial epistemicide prevails despite it being vehemently challenged. Our aim is to weave a text(ile), an ontoepstemic approach, to (re)configure Religion Education in support of the transformative potential of the decolonial project in South Africa. In our pursuit of ontoepistemic justice, we advocate for decolonising the Religion Education curriculum, understood as a verb, as (1) a means to critical empowerment and as (2) a complex encounter with entangled, embedded knowledges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-6200</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-7931</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01416200.2020.1809993</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Christianity ; Constructivism (Learning) ; Curriculum Development ; decolonisation ; Decolonization ; diffraction ; Educational Change ; Educational Philosophy ; Epistemology ; Foreign Countries ; Foreign Policy ; Justice ; ontoepistemic ; Ontology ; posthumanism ; Religion ; Religion education ; Religious Education ; Social Change ; Social Systems ; Student Teachers ; Teacher Education Programs ; Teaching Methods ; Transformative Learning</subject><ispartof>British journal of religious education, 2021-01, Vol.43 (1), p.80-90</ispartof><rights>2020 Christian Education 2020</rights><rights>2020 Christian Education</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-fb3a6e2edd882b375bba2000faa020e2616177792ae1df349078253bedf6adbb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-fb3a6e2edd882b375bba2000faa020e2616177792ae1df349078253bedf6adbb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27898,27899</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1277808$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>du Preez, Petro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmonds, Shan</creatorcontrib><title>Reading posthumanism and decolonisation diffractively towards (re)configuring an ontoepistemic approach to religion education</title><title>British journal of religious education</title><description>Student-teachers are exposed to different approaches to teaching Religion Education in South Africa. Amongst these have been the phenomenological-reflective-dialogical approach of Cornelia Roux and the empathetic-reflective-dialogical approach of Janet Jarvis. These different approaches made immeasurable contributions as they started to shift how Religion Education has been taught. The approaches are both informed by a social constructivist methodology, which riposte previous traditionalist approaches. This article questions whether these approaches, amidst the decolonial turn and the posthuman predicament, are still germane as they tend to separate ontology from epistemology. A diffractive reading of posthumanist theory and decolonial literature enabled us to bring texts in intra-action so as to problematise the colonial, capitalist and patriarchal character of existing approaches to Religion Education, both ontologically and epistemologically. This remains pivotal for a country like South Africa where colonial epistemicide prevails despite it being vehemently challenged. Our aim is to weave a text(ile), an ontoepstemic approach, to (re)configure Religion Education in support of the transformative potential of the decolonial project in South Africa. In our pursuit of ontoepistemic justice, we advocate for decolonising the Religion Education curriculum, understood as a verb, as (1) a means to critical empowerment and as (2) a complex encounter with entangled, embedded knowledges.</description><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Constructivism (Learning)</subject><subject>Curriculum Development</subject><subject>decolonisation</subject><subject>Decolonization</subject><subject>diffraction</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Philosophy</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Foreign Policy</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>ontoepistemic</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>posthumanism</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion education</subject><subject>Religious Education</subject><subject>Social Change</subject><subject>Social Systems</subject><subject>Student Teachers</subject><subject>Teacher Education Programs</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Transformative Learning</subject><issn>0141-6200</issn><issn>1740-7931</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9v1DAQxS0EEkvhI1SyxAUOKWM7Gyc3UFUoqBISgrM18Z-tq8QOtkO1B747Trdw5GSN5703Mz9CzhlcMOjhHbCWdRzgggOvXz0MwyCekB2TLTRyEOwp2W2aZhM9Jy9yvgMQrO1hR35_s2h8ONAl5nK7zhh8nikGQ43VcYq1xOJjoMY7l1AX_8tOR1riPSaT6Ztk3-oYnD-saUvBQGMo0S4-Fzt7TXFZUkR9Wx002ckftixrVv2Q-pI8czhl--rxPSM_Pl59v7xubr5--nz54abRooPSuFFgZ7k1pu_5KOR-HLGeAg6xXmx5xzompRw4WmacaAeQPd-L0RrXoRlHcUZen3LrMj9Xm4u6i2sKdaTibdcKsQfZVtX-pNIp5pysU0vyM6ajYqA20uovabWRVo-kq-_85LPJ63-eqy-MS9lDX_vvT30fXEwz3sc0GVXwOMVUmQbtsxL_H_EHKO-Rvg</recordid><startdate>20210102</startdate><enddate>20210102</enddate><creator>du Preez, Petro</creator><creator>Simmonds, Shan</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210102</creationdate><title>Reading posthumanism and decolonisation diffractively towards (re)configuring an ontoepistemic approach to religion education</title><author>du Preez, Petro ; Simmonds, Shan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-fb3a6e2edd882b375bba2000faa020e2616177792ae1df349078253bedf6adbb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Constructivism (Learning)</topic><topic>Curriculum Development</topic><topic>decolonisation</topic><topic>Decolonization</topic><topic>diffraction</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Philosophy</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Foreign Policy</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>ontoepistemic</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>posthumanism</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion education</topic><topic>Religious Education</topic><topic>Social Change</topic><topic>Social Systems</topic><topic>Student Teachers</topic><topic>Teacher Education Programs</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Transformative Learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>du Preez, Petro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmonds, Shan</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>British journal of religious education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>du Preez, Petro</au><au>Simmonds, Shan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1277808</ericid><atitle>Reading posthumanism and decolonisation diffractively towards (re)configuring an ontoepistemic approach to religion education</atitle><jtitle>British journal of religious education</jtitle><date>2021-01-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>80-90</pages><issn>0141-6200</issn><eissn>1740-7931</eissn><abstract>Student-teachers are exposed to different approaches to teaching Religion Education in South Africa. Amongst these have been the phenomenological-reflective-dialogical approach of Cornelia Roux and the empathetic-reflective-dialogical approach of Janet Jarvis. These different approaches made immeasurable contributions as they started to shift how Religion Education has been taught. The approaches are both informed by a social constructivist methodology, which riposte previous traditionalist approaches. This article questions whether these approaches, amidst the decolonial turn and the posthuman predicament, are still germane as they tend to separate ontology from epistemology. A diffractive reading of posthumanist theory and decolonial literature enabled us to bring texts in intra-action so as to problematise the colonial, capitalist and patriarchal character of existing approaches to Religion Education, both ontologically and epistemologically. This remains pivotal for a country like South Africa where colonial epistemicide prevails despite it being vehemently challenged. Our aim is to weave a text(ile), an ontoepstemic approach, to (re)configure Religion Education in support of the transformative potential of the decolonial project in South Africa. In our pursuit of ontoepistemic justice, we advocate for decolonising the Religion Education curriculum, understood as a verb, as (1) a means to critical empowerment and as (2) a complex encounter with entangled, embedded knowledges.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/01416200.2020.1809993</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-6200
ispartof British journal of religious education, 2021-01, Vol.43 (1), p.80-90
issn 0141-6200
1740-7931
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1277808
source ERIC; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Christianity
Constructivism (Learning)
Curriculum Development
decolonisation
Decolonization
diffraction
Educational Change
Educational Philosophy
Epistemology
Foreign Countries
Foreign Policy
Justice
ontoepistemic
Ontology
posthumanism
Religion
Religion education
Religious Education
Social Change
Social Systems
Student Teachers
Teacher Education Programs
Teaching Methods
Transformative Learning
title Reading posthumanism and decolonisation diffractively towards (re)configuring an ontoepistemic approach to religion education
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-03T18%3A14%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reading%20posthumanism%20and%20decolonisation%20diffractively%20towards%20(re)configuring%20an%20ontoepistemic%20approach%20to%20religion%20education&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20religious%20education&rft.au=du%20Preez,%20Petro&rft.date=2021-01-02&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=80-90&rft.issn=0141-6200&rft.eissn=1740-7931&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01416200.2020.1809993&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2464335074%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-fb3a6e2edd882b375bba2000faa020e2616177792ae1df349078253bedf6adbb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464335074&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1277808&rfr_iscdi=true