Assessment of junior doctors' perceptions of difficulty of medical specialty training programs

The demands placed on medical trainees by the different specialty training programs are important considerations when choosing a medical specialty. To understand these demands, 193 junior doctors completed a web-based survey, and: (a) ranked medical specialties according to perceived level of traini...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of vocational education & training 2012-06, Vol.64 (2), p.199-210
Main Authors: Rogers, Mary E., Creed, Peter A., Searle, Judy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Attitudes
Australia
Career Choice
Career planning
Comparative Education
Context Effect
Difficulty Level
Foreign Countries
Graduate medical education
House officers
junior doctors
Labour force
Medical Education
Medical practitioners
medical specialty
Medical Students
medical values
Medicine
Postsecondary education
Prestigious
Public Health
Ranking
Scaling
Shortages
Specialists
Status
Student Attitudes
Surgery
training difficulty
Undergraduate Study
Values
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The demands placed on medical trainees by the different specialty training programs are important considerations when choosing a medical specialty. To understand these demands, 193 junior doctors completed a web-based survey, and: (a) ranked medical specialties according to perceived level of training difficulty (incorporating entry difficulty, course difficulty, and length of training); (b) nominated their preferred medical specialty; and (c) completed a measure of medical values. To validate the hierarchical ranking of training programs, we tested the association between the difficulty ranking of doctors' own preferred medical specialty and medical values. Ophthalmology, surgery, dermatology, anaesthesiology and intensive care medicine were ranked as the most difficult specialties, and general practice, public health medicine, occupational medicine, medical administration, and rehabilitation medicine as the least difficult. Higher training difficulty specialties were seen as more prestigious and intellectually demanding, whereas lower training difficulty specialties were seen as consistent with lifestyle and service values. Having a hierarchical ranking of perceived difficulty level of medical specialty training programs will assist students and junior doctors when making career decisions, and assist medical workforce planners, educators, and the specialist colleges to formulate strategies to attract potential applicants to fields of medicine where workforce shortages exist.
ISSN:1363-6820
1747-5090
DOI:10.1080/13636820.2011.630538