Genetic and morphological data fail to differentiate Chara intermedia from C. baltica, or C. polyacantha and C. rudis from C. hispida

Genetic variation of five species belonging to the section Hartmania – Chara baltica, C. intermedia, C. hispida, C. polyacantha and C. rudis – was investigated using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) techniques. Chara intermedia can be distinguished from the others by the presence or abs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of phycology 2013-08, Vol.48 (3), p.253-259
Main Authors: Urbaniak, Jacek, Combik, Michał
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
AFLP
amplified fragment length polymorphism
biosystematics
Chara
Chara baltica
Chara hispida
Chara intermedia
Chara polyacantha
Chara rudis
Charophyta
freshwater
genetic variation
genetics
Hartmania
taxonomy
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Genetic variation of five species belonging to the section Hartmania – Chara baltica, C. intermedia, C. hispida, C. polyacantha and C. rudis – was investigated using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) techniques. Chara intermedia can be distinguished from the others by the presence or absence of numerous morphological characters. However, probably because of the high variability of the morphological features and common occurrence of apparently transitional forms, more than 80 specimens of the five species were collected and analysed. The specimens were collected from a total of 24 sites, including freshwater localities and sites in the Baltic Sea, initially classified into the five species based on morphological features, and then analysed using AFLP; as an outgroup we used C. globularis. The specimens formed two groups, the first group comprising C. intermedia and C. baltica, the second C. hispida, C. rudis and C. polyacantha. No consistent genetic differences were found between species within each of the two groups. Transitional forms of C. hispida/C. rudis were placed in a clade between individuals of C. hispida and C. rudis. Local populations of some charophytes differ morphologically from one another, possibly as a result of local adaptation.
ISSN:1469-4433
0967-0262
1469-4433
DOI:10.1080/09670262.2013.805249