Loading…

An efficient sampling method for fast and accurate Monte Carlo Simulations

Currently, there are two published Monte Carlo Simulations (MCS) methods for estimating design floods in Australia: The Cooperative Research Centre - Catchment Hydrology (CRC-CH) method and the Total Probability Theorem (TPT) method. The CRC-CH method uses variable storm durations, which makes it an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Australian journal of water resources 2016-07, Vol.20 (2), p.160-168
Main Authors: Diermanse, F. L. M., Carroll, D. G., Beckers, J. V. L., Ayre, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Currently, there are two published Monte Carlo Simulations (MCS) methods for estimating design floods in Australia: The Cooperative Research Centre - Catchment Hydrology (CRC-CH) method and the Total Probability Theorem (TPT) method. The CRC-CH method uses variable storm durations, which makes it an attractive option compared with the TPT method. However, the CRC-CH method suffers from a large variance in design flood estimates for large to extreme events, i.e. events with low annual exceedance probabilities (AEP). This means two successive MCS runs may provide significantly different design flows, which makes the method unreliable for large to extreme events. Decreasing this variance to an acceptable level may require millions of hydrological model simulations. We introduced an alternative sampling technique, known as 'importance sampling', in the CRC-CH method to address this shortcoming. In a pilot study we demonstrate that this results in a significantly reduced variance in design flood estimates for large to extreme events. At the same time, computation times are significantly shortened. This creates opportunities for greater use of the CRC-CH method and similar Monte Carlo methods in applications where they were previously considered infeasible, such as dam design.
ISSN:1324-1583
2204-227X
DOI:10.1080/13241583.2017.1304019