Loading…
Ecological consequences of Great Lakes salmon subsidies for stream-resident brook and brown trout
Introduced Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) deliver novel, pulsed resource subsidies to Great Lakes streams. We explored interactions between native brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and non-native brown trout (Salmo trutta) in the context of this resource pulse. Diets surveyed before and during...
Saved in:
Published in: | Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences 2020-11, Vol.77 (11), p.1758-1771 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-711c313f9d049dbf6ac3aafbc8e8f8ecb18c6322ce1b75060899b4256a7229a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-711c313f9d049dbf6ac3aafbc8e8f8ecb18c6322ce1b75060899b4256a7229a3 |
container_end_page | 1771 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1758 |
container_title | Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Hermann, Nathan T Chaloner, Dominic T Gerig, Brandon S Lamberti, Gary A |
description | Introduced Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) deliver novel, pulsed resource subsidies to Great Lakes streams. We explored interactions between native brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and non-native brown trout (Salmo trutta) in the context of this resource pulse. Diets surveyed before and during salmon spawning showed that, regardless of species, trout consumed 4.5-fold more biomass during than before salmon runs. Brook trout grew more quickly than brown trout under controlled feeding regimes due, in part, to their higher food conversion efficiency of 36% compared with 21%. Bioenergetics model simulations explored the influence of temperature on the exploitation of resource pulses and found 35% lower growth rates and increased gorging at colder temperatures. Overall, we found evidence that brook trout and brown trout foraging and growth are modulated by the salmon resource pulse, especially through gorging on eggs. However, these species exhibit distinct physiological adaptations and environmental preferences that may influence their ultimate capacity to exploit resource pulses. The effects of environmental conditions and salmon subsidies on stream-resident trout have broader consequences for fisheries management and conservation efforts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1139/cjfas-2020-0086 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A639736720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A639736720</galeid><sourcerecordid>A639736720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-711c313f9d049dbf6ac3aafbc8e8f8ecb18c6322ce1b75060899b4256a7229a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVks9vFCEcxUmjSdfq2SvRkwdafiwMc2ya2jbZaGJ76I18h4F1trOwBSbV_16m68EmG43hALx83vuG8BB6z-gpY6I9sxsPmXDKKaFUqyO0YJxK0kghXqEFbagiSvL7Y_Qm5w2ljEtGFwgubRzjerAwYhtDdo-TC9ZlHD2-Sg4KXsFDvWYYtzHgPHV56Icq-JhwLpXYkuSq5kLBXYrxAUPo59NTwCXFqbxFrz2M2b37vZ-gu8-XdxfXZPX16ubifEWsZLyQhjErmPBtT5dt33kFVgD4zmqnvXa2Y9oqwbl1rGskVVS3bbfkUkHDeQviBH3cx-5SrG_IxWzilEKdaPhSa9o2gsu_U3JJG91qWimyp9YwOjMEH0sCu3bBJRhjcH6o8rkSNVM1fOY_HODtbng0f0KnB6C6ercd7MHUTy8MlSnuR1nDlLO5uf32H-yXl-zZnrUp5pycN7s0bCH9NIyauUrmuUpmrpKZq1QdfO8IydbPdpDs93-afgHBUMpL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2454078980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecological consequences of Great Lakes salmon subsidies for stream-resident brook and brown trout</title><source>NRC Research Press</source><creator>Hermann, Nathan T ; Chaloner, Dominic T ; Gerig, Brandon S ; Lamberti, Gary A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Nathan T ; Chaloner, Dominic T ; Gerig, Brandon S ; Lamberti, Gary A</creatorcontrib><description>Introduced Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) deliver novel, pulsed resource subsidies to Great Lakes streams. We explored interactions between native brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and non-native brown trout (Salmo trutta) in the context of this resource pulse. Diets surveyed before and during salmon spawning showed that, regardless of species, trout consumed 4.5-fold more biomass during than before salmon runs. Brook trout grew more quickly than brown trout under controlled feeding regimes due, in part, to their higher food conversion efficiency of 36% compared with 21%. Bioenergetics model simulations explored the influence of temperature on the exploitation of resource pulses and found 35% lower growth rates and increased gorging at colder temperatures. Overall, we found evidence that brook trout and brown trout foraging and growth are modulated by the salmon resource pulse, especially through gorging on eggs. However, these species exhibit distinct physiological adaptations and environmental preferences that may influence their ultimate capacity to exploit resource pulses. The effects of environmental conditions and salmon subsidies on stream-resident trout have broader consequences for fisheries management and conservation efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0706-652X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1205-7533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2020-0086</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>1840 Woodward Drive, Suite 1, Ottawa, ON K2C 0P7: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Bioenergetics ; Case studies ; Conservation ; Ecological effects ; Ecosystems ; Eggs ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental effects ; Exploitation ; Feeding habits ; Feeding preferences ; Feeding regimes ; Fish eggs ; Fisheries ; Fisheries management ; Fishery management ; Food and nutrition ; Food chains ; Food consumption ; Food conversion ; Food supply ; Foraging ; Freshwater ; Growth ; Growth rate ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; Lakes ; Modelling ; Oncorhynchus ; Pacific salmon ; Predation ; Resource exploitation ; Salmo trutta ; Salmon ; Salmoniformes ; Salvelinus fontinalis ; Simulation ; Spawning ; Spawning populations ; Streams ; Subsidies ; Trout ; Varieties ; Water temperature</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences, 2020-11, Vol.77 (11), p.1758-1771</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 NRC Research Press</rights><rights>2020 Published by NRC Research Press</rights><rights>Copyright 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-711c313f9d049dbf6ac3aafbc8e8f8ecb18c6322ce1b75060899b4256a7229a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-711c313f9d049dbf6ac3aafbc8e8f8ecb18c6322ce1b75060899b4256a7229a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cjfas-2020-0086$$EPDF$$P50$$Gnrcresearch$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/full/10.1139/cjfas-2020-0086$$EHTML$$P50$$Gnrcresearch$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2932,27924,27925,64428,65234</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Nathan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaloner, Dominic T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerig, Brandon S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamberti, Gary A</creatorcontrib><title>Ecological consequences of Great Lakes salmon subsidies for stream-resident brook and brown trout</title><title>Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences</title><description>Introduced Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) deliver novel, pulsed resource subsidies to Great Lakes streams. We explored interactions between native brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and non-native brown trout (Salmo trutta) in the context of this resource pulse. Diets surveyed before and during salmon spawning showed that, regardless of species, trout consumed 4.5-fold more biomass during than before salmon runs. Brook trout grew more quickly than brown trout under controlled feeding regimes due, in part, to their higher food conversion efficiency of 36% compared with 21%. Bioenergetics model simulations explored the influence of temperature on the exploitation of resource pulses and found 35% lower growth rates and increased gorging at colder temperatures. Overall, we found evidence that brook trout and brown trout foraging and growth are modulated by the salmon resource pulse, especially through gorging on eggs. However, these species exhibit distinct physiological adaptations and environmental preferences that may influence their ultimate capacity to exploit resource pulses. The effects of environmental conditions and salmon subsidies on stream-resident trout have broader consequences for fisheries management and conservation efforts.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Bioenergetics</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>Feeding habits</subject><subject>Feeding preferences</subject><subject>Feeding regimes</subject><subject>Fish eggs</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Fishery management</subject><subject>Food and nutrition</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food conversion</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus</subject><subject>Pacific salmon</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Resource exploitation</subject><subject>Salmo trutta</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Salmoniformes</subject><subject>Salvelinus fontinalis</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Spawning</subject><subject>Spawning populations</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Trout</subject><subject>Varieties</subject><subject>Water temperature</subject><issn>0706-652X</issn><issn>1205-7533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVks9vFCEcxUmjSdfq2SvRkwdafiwMc2ya2jbZaGJ76I18h4F1trOwBSbV_16m68EmG43hALx83vuG8BB6z-gpY6I9sxsPmXDKKaFUqyO0YJxK0kghXqEFbagiSvL7Y_Qm5w2ljEtGFwgubRzjerAwYhtDdo-TC9ZlHD2-Sg4KXsFDvWYYtzHgPHV56Icq-JhwLpXYkuSq5kLBXYrxAUPo59NTwCXFqbxFrz2M2b37vZ-gu8-XdxfXZPX16ubifEWsZLyQhjErmPBtT5dt33kFVgD4zmqnvXa2Y9oqwbl1rGskVVS3bbfkUkHDeQviBH3cx-5SrG_IxWzilEKdaPhSa9o2gsu_U3JJG91qWimyp9YwOjMEH0sCu3bBJRhjcH6o8rkSNVM1fOY_HODtbng0f0KnB6C6ercd7MHUTy8MlSnuR1nDlLO5uf32H-yXl-zZnrUp5pycN7s0bCH9NIyauUrmuUpmrpKZq1QdfO8IydbPdpDs93-afgHBUMpL</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Hermann, Nathan T</creator><creator>Chaloner, Dominic T</creator><creator>Gerig, Brandon S</creator><creator>Lamberti, Gary A</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Ecological consequences of Great Lakes salmon subsidies for stream-resident brook and brown trout</title><author>Hermann, Nathan T ; Chaloner, Dominic T ; Gerig, Brandon S ; Lamberti, Gary A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-711c313f9d049dbf6ac3aafbc8e8f8ecb18c6322ce1b75060899b4256a7229a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Bioenergetics</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>Feeding habits</topic><topic>Feeding preferences</topic><topic>Feeding regimes</topic><topic>Fish eggs</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Fishery management</topic><topic>Food and nutrition</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food conversion</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus</topic><topic>Pacific salmon</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Resource exploitation</topic><topic>Salmo trutta</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Salmoniformes</topic><topic>Salvelinus fontinalis</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Spawning</topic><topic>Spawning populations</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Trout</topic><topic>Varieties</topic><topic>Water temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Nathan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaloner, Dominic T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerig, Brandon S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamberti, Gary A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hermann, Nathan T</au><au>Chaloner, Dominic T</au><au>Gerig, Brandon S</au><au>Lamberti, Gary A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecological consequences of Great Lakes salmon subsidies for stream-resident brook and brown trout</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1758</spage><epage>1771</epage><pages>1758-1771</pages><issn>0706-652X</issn><eissn>1205-7533</eissn><abstract>Introduced Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) deliver novel, pulsed resource subsidies to Great Lakes streams. We explored interactions between native brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and non-native brown trout (Salmo trutta) in the context of this resource pulse. Diets surveyed before and during salmon spawning showed that, regardless of species, trout consumed 4.5-fold more biomass during than before salmon runs. Brook trout grew more quickly than brown trout under controlled feeding regimes due, in part, to their higher food conversion efficiency of 36% compared with 21%. Bioenergetics model simulations explored the influence of temperature on the exploitation of resource pulses and found 35% lower growth rates and increased gorging at colder temperatures. Overall, we found evidence that brook trout and brown trout foraging and growth are modulated by the salmon resource pulse, especially through gorging on eggs. However, these species exhibit distinct physiological adaptations and environmental preferences that may influence their ultimate capacity to exploit resource pulses. The effects of environmental conditions and salmon subsidies on stream-resident trout have broader consequences for fisheries management and conservation efforts.</abstract><cop>1840 Woodward Drive, Suite 1, Ottawa, ON K2C 0P7</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/cjfas-2020-0086</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0706-652X |
ispartof | Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences, 2020-11, Vol.77 (11), p.1758-1771 |
issn | 0706-652X 1205-7533 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A639736720 |
source | NRC Research Press |
subjects | Adaptation Bioenergetics Case studies Conservation Ecological effects Ecosystems Eggs Environmental aspects Environmental conditions Environmental effects Exploitation Feeding habits Feeding preferences Feeding regimes Fish eggs Fisheries Fisheries management Fishery management Food and nutrition Food chains Food consumption Food conversion Food supply Foraging Freshwater Growth Growth rate Introduced species Invasive species Lakes Modelling Oncorhynchus Pacific salmon Predation Resource exploitation Salmo trutta Salmon Salmoniformes Salvelinus fontinalis Simulation Spawning Spawning populations Streams Subsidies Trout Varieties Water temperature |
title | Ecological consequences of Great Lakes salmon subsidies for stream-resident brook and brown trout |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A47%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecological%20consequences%20of%20Great%20Lakes%20salmon%20subsidies%20for%20stream-resident%20brook%20and%20brown%20trout&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20fisheries%20and%20aquatic%20sciences&rft.au=Hermann,%20Nathan%20T&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1758&rft.epage=1771&rft.pages=1758-1771&rft.issn=0706-652X&rft.eissn=1205-7533&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/cjfas-2020-0086&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA639736720%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-711c313f9d049dbf6ac3aafbc8e8f8ecb18c6322ce1b75060899b4256a7229a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2454078980&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A639736720&rfr_iscdi=true |