Loading…

In Situ Formation of MoS[sub.2] on the Surface of CF to Improve the Tribological Properties of PUE

The roller is an important part of the belt conveyor used in coal transportation. Due to the harsh environment of coal mines, the rollers are in a state of high load and high friction for a long time, which causes wear failure and has a serious impact on the reliability and safety of the equipment....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Materials 2023-08, Vol.16 (17)
Main Authors: Feng, Cunao, Guo, Yu, Li, Xiaowei, Cao, Yang, Kuang, Qiuxue, Zhang, Minghui, Zhang, Dekun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The roller is an important part of the belt conveyor used in coal transportation. Due to the harsh environment of coal mines, the rollers are in a state of high load and high friction for a long time, which causes wear failure and has a serious impact on the reliability and safety of the equipment. In order to prepare roller material with excellent bearing performance and friction performance, CF/PUE composites were prepared by pouring method with polyurethane as the matrix and carbon fiber as reinforcement. Due to the low surface activity of unmodified carbon fibers and poor bonding performance with the matrix, MoS[sub.2] was generated on the surface of carbon fiber by the in situ generation method in this paper. It was found that the mechanical properties of MoS[sub.2]/CF/PUE composites were better when the CF content was 0.3 wt%. The Shore hardness reached 92.2 HA, which is 10% higher than pure polyurethane. The tensile strength was 38.44 MPa, which is 53% higher than pure polyurethane. The elongation at break was 850%, which is 16% higher than pure polyurethane. The maximum compressive stress was 2.32 MPa, which is 42% higher than pure polyurethane. The friction coefficient was much lower than that of pure PUE composites, the friction coefficient was 0.284, which is 59% lower than pure polyurethane.
ISSN:1996-1944
1996-1944
DOI:10.3390/ma16175773