Loading…
The Coordinated Effects of CO[sub.2] and Air Pollutant Emission Changes Induced by Inter-Provincial Trade in China
Inter-provincial trade leads to changes in CO[sub.2] and air pollutant emissions. However, there is a research gap regarding the coordinated effects (co-effects) between embodied CO[sub.2] and air pollutant emissions in trade. Understanding co-effects in inter-provincial trade is a prerequisite for...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sustainability 2024-02, Vol.16 (4) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Inter-provincial trade leads to changes in CO[sub.2] and air pollutant emissions. However, there is a research gap regarding the coordinated effects (co-effects) between embodied CO[sub.2] and air pollutant emissions in trade. Understanding co-effects in inter-provincial trade is a prerequisite for driving the green transformation of trade and achieving coordination between pollution and carbon reduction. Here, we calculated provincial-level CO[sub.2] and air pollutant emission leakage in 2012 and 2017 based on a modified input–output model and, for the first time, investigated the co-effects between CO[sub.2] and air pollutant emission leakage caused by emissions transfers in China. Three types of co-effects, categorized as co-benefits, trade-offs, and co-damage, were discovered and defined to reveal the provincial differences. Furthermore, combined with structural decomposition analysis (SDA), we calculated the interannual variation in trade-induced emissions and identified the key driving factors of provincial-level co-effects from 2012 to 2017. Optimizing the energy structure has led to the greatest co-benefits, while changes in the industrial structure and emission coefficients have led to limited co-benefits in specific provinces. Variations in trade volume have led to co-damages across all provinces, and changes in emission coefficients have led to trade-offs in the majority of provinces. The case analysis confirmed that identifying and adjusting the key driving factors of co-effects can promote the transformation from co-damage and trade-offs to co-benefits. The findings implied a new approach for the reduction in pollution and carbon through inter-provincial trade. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
DOI: | 10.3390/su16041706 |