Loading…

Experimental study of the distribution of chemical products against rising damp in substrates with different water saturation degrees

► Curing, spreading and effectiveness of 15 injection products were investigated. ► Curing time and percentage of components left after curing varied greatly among products. ► These differences depended on solvent type and form (liquid or crème) of product. ► Spreading of products in (wet) bricks wa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Construction & building materials 2013-03, Vol.40, p.891-898
Main Authors: Lubelli, B., van Hees, R.P.J., Hacquebord, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:► Curing, spreading and effectiveness of 15 injection products were investigated. ► Curing time and percentage of components left after curing varied greatly among products. ► These differences depended on solvent type and form (liquid or crème) of product. ► Spreading of products in (wet) bricks was strongly affected by the solvent type. ► Liquid silane/siloxane products in water showed the best spreading in wet bricks. Injection of chemicals in masonry walls is a commonly used technique for tackling rising damp. The presence of a high moisture content in the wall to be injected may sometimes limit the effectiveness of the intervention. This paper reports an experimental study of curing time, spreading and effectiveness of 15 injection products in bricks with different water saturation degrees. Significant differences in curing times and percentages of components left after curing were observed among products. The spreading and the effectiveness of products in (wet) substrates resulted to strongly depend on the solvent and, in a lesser way, on the active components. Liquid water based silane/siloxane products showed to spread homogeneously and reduce water uptake the most.
ISSN:0950-0618
1879-0526
DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.062