Loading…
Life After the Subject
The Introduction to this special issue examines the transformation of theoretical practices in the humanities between the late 1980s and the present. It maps the path leading from the titular question of the 1991 volume Who Comes After the Subject? to this issue's question of what comes after t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cultural critique 2017-03, Vol.96 (1), p.1-36 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The Introduction to this special issue examines the transformation of theoretical practices in the humanities between the late 1980s and the present. It maps the path leading from the titular question of the 1991 volume Who Comes After the Subject? to this issue's question of what comes after the subject. While this essay focuses in particular on the biopolitical turn in the humanities, it also addresses the emergence of affect studies, the new materialisms, and posthumanism as different genres of thinking the whatness of subjectivity and its aftermath. Rather than reveling in life after the subject, this essay marks the ambivalence of this whatness, which, on the one hand, designates the insecurity of any “who,” the many violences through which selfhood can be crushed, and, on the other hand, the reinvention of politics through a tarrying with heterogeneous materialities, the production of new ways of being with others in the world. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0882-4371 1460-2458 1534-5203 1460-2458 |
DOI: | 10.1353/cul.2017.a669098 |