Loading…

Interaction of elongation factor eEF‐2 with ribosomal P proteins

The eukaryotic P1 and P2 ribosomal proteins which constitute, with P0, a pentamer forming the lateral stalk of the 60 S ribosomal subunit, exhibit several differences from their prokaryotic equivalents L7 and L12; in particular, P1 does not have the same primary structure as P2 and both of them are...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European Journal of Biochemistry 1999-06, Vol.262 (2), p.606-611
Main Authors: Bargis‐Surgey, Patricia, Lavergne, Jean‐Pierre, Gonzalo, Philippe, Vard, Cécile, Filhol‐Cochet, Odile, Reboud, Jean‐Paul
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The eukaryotic P1 and P2 ribosomal proteins which constitute, with P0, a pentamer forming the lateral stalk of the 60 S ribosomal subunit, exhibit several differences from their prokaryotic equivalents L7 and L12; in particular, P1 does not have the same primary structure as P2 and both of them are phosphorylated, the significance of the latter remaining unclear. Rat liver P1 and P2 were overproduced in Escherichia coli cells and their interaction with elongation factor eEF‐2 was studied. Both recombinant proteins were found to be required for the ribosome‐dependent GTPase activity of eEF‐2, with P2 in the phosphorylated form. The surface plasmon resonance technique revealed that, in vitro, both proteins interact specifically with eEF‐2, with a higher affinity for P1 (Kd = 3.8 × 10−8 m) than for P2 (Kd = 2.2 × 10−6 m). Phosphorylation resulted in a moderate increase (two‐ to four‐fold) in these affinities. The interaction of both P1 and P2 (phosphorylated or not) with eEF‐2 resulted in a conformational change in the factor, revealed by an increase in the accessibility of Glu554 to proteinase Glu‐C. This increase was observed in both the presence and absence of GTP and GDP, which themselves produced marked opposite effects on the conformation of eEF‐2. Our results suggest that the two proteins P1 and P2 both interact with eEF‐2 inducing a conformational transition of the factor, but have acquired some specific properties during evolution.
ISSN:0014-2956
1432-1033
1432-1327
DOI:10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00434.x