Loading…

A quality control program for mutation detection in KIT and PDGFRA in gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Background Although most gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) carry oncogenic mutations in KIT exons 9, 11, 13 and 17, or in platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha ( PDGFRA ) exons 12, 14 and 18, around 10% of GIST are free of these mutations. Genotyping and accurate detection of KIT / PDG...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of gastroenterology 2011-05, Vol.46 (5), p.586-594
Main Authors: Hostein, Isabelle, Debiec-Rychter, Maria, Olschwang, Sylvianne, Bringuier, Pierre-Paul, Toffolati, Louisa, Gonzalez, David, Forget, Sébastien, Escande, Fabienne, Morzuch, Lucyna, Tamborini, Elena, Faur, Nicolas, Pilotti, Silvana, Dei Tos, Paolo, Emile, Jean-François, Coindre, Jean-Michel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Although most gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) carry oncogenic mutations in KIT exons 9, 11, 13 and 17, or in platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha ( PDGFRA ) exons 12, 14 and 18, around 10% of GIST are free of these mutations. Genotyping and accurate detection of KIT / PDGFRA mutations in GIST are becoming increasingly useful for clinicians in the management of the disease. Method To evaluate and improve laboratory practice in GIST mutation detection, we developed a mutational screening quality control program. Eleven laboratories were enrolled in this program and 50 DNA samples were analysed, each of them by four different laboratories, giving 200 mutational reports. Results In total, eight mutations were not detected by at least one laboratory. One false positive result was reported in one sample. Thus, the mean global rate of error with clinical implication based on 200 reports was 4.5%. Concerning specific polymorphisms detection, the rate varied from 0 to 100%, depending on the laboratory. The way mutations were reported was very heterogeneous, and some errors were detected. Conclusion This study demonstrated that such a program was necessary for laboratories to improve the quality of the analysis, because an error rate of 4.5% may have clinical consequences for the patient.
ISSN:0944-1174
1435-5922
DOI:10.1007/s00535-011-0375-0