Highly siderophile elements in Earth’s mantle as a clock for the Moon-forming impact

• Published in: Nature (London) 2014-04, Vol.508 (7494), p.84-87
• Main Authors: Jacobson, Seth A., Morbidelli, Alessandro, Raymond, Sean N., O'Brien, David P., Walsh, Kevin J., Rubie, David C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 639/33/445/845; 639/33/445/847; 704/2151/209; 704/445/845; Accretion; Analysis; Astronomical collisions; Astrophysics; Earth; Earth and Planetary Astrophysics; Earth mantle; Geochemistry; Humanities and Social Sciences; Jupiter; letter; Mantle (Geology); Mars; Moon; multidisciplinary; Natural history; Origin; Physics; Ratios; Science; Sciences of the Universe; Solar system; Space exploration; Sun; Transition metals
• ISSN: 0028-0836; 1476-4687
• DOI: 10.1038/nature13172

A large number of N -body simulations of the giant-impact phase of planet formation, combined with the measured concentrations of highly siderophile elements in Earth’s mantle, reveal that the Moon must have formed at least 40 million years after the condensation of the first solids of the Solar System. Dating the new Moon The age of the Moon has been a focus for geochemists for at least the past three decades. A number of chronometers have been used to address the question but the results differ from method to method, in part because of the varying assumptions required in the calculation of the so-called model ages. Seth Jacobson et al . have used an alternative approach. They run a large number of numerical simulations, some based on early Moon-forming events, others later events. They then arrive at a model-independent correlation between the formation age of the Moon and the amount of mass accreted by the Earth since then, the so-called Late Veneer. The concentration of highly-siderophile (iron-loving) elements observed in the Earth's mantle provides a constraint on the timing and rules out an early Moon-forming event. Instead, the authors calculate that the Moon-forming impact must have occurred at least 40 million years after formation of the Solar System. According to the generally accepted scenario, the last giant impact on Earth formed the Moon and initiated the final phase of core formation by melting Earth’s mantle. A key goal of geochemistry is to date this event, but different ages have been proposed. Some 1 , 2 , 3 argue for an early Moon-forming event, approximately 30 million years (Myr) after the condensation of the first solids in the Solar System, whereas others 4 , 5 , 6 claim a date later than 50 Myr (and possibly as late as around 100 Myr) after condensation. Here we show that a Moon-forming event at 40 Myr after condensation, or earlier, is ruled out at a 99.9 per cent confidence level. We use a large number of N -body simulations to demonstrate a relationship between the time of the last giant impact on an Earth-like planet and the amount of mass subsequently added during the era known as Late Accretion. As the last giant impact is delayed, the late-accreted mass decreases in a predictable fashion. This relationship exists within both the classical scenario 7 , 8 and the Grand Tack scenario 9 , 10 of terrestrial planet formation, and holds across a wide range of disk conditions. The concentration of highly siderophile elements (HSEs