Loading…

An economic analysis of the possibility of reducing pesticides in French field crops

The paper aims to study the effects of reducing pesticide use by farmers in the arable sector in France and the feasibility of a policy target of reducing pesticide use by half. The originality of the approach is to combine statistical data and expert knowledge to describe low-input alternative tech...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological economics 2011-07, Vol.70 (9), p.1638-1648
Main Authors: Jacquet, Florence, Butault, Jean-Pierre, Guichard, Laurence
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The paper aims to study the effects of reducing pesticide use by farmers in the arable sector in France and the feasibility of a policy target of reducing pesticide use by half. The originality of the approach is to combine statistical data and expert knowledge to describe low-input alternative techniques at the national level. These data are used in a mathematical programming model to simulate the effect on land use, production and farmers' income of achieving different levels of pesticide reduction. The results show that reducing pesticide use by 30% could be possible without reducing farmers' income. We also estimate the levels of tax on pesticides necessary to achieve different levels of reduction of pesticide use and the effect of an incentive mechanism combining a pesticide tax with subsidies for low-input techniques. ► We study the feasibility of reducing pesticide use in French field crops. ► Alternative crop management techniques have been identified. ► At a national level, their adoption could allow a reduction of pesticides up to 30%. ► It requires public policies relating to extension, training and economic incentives. ► Taxes and subsidies should be set at levels high enough to reach the target.
ISSN:0921-8009
1873-6106
DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.003