Loading…
Area‐preserving diffeomorphisms of the hyperbolic plane and K‐surfaces in anti‐de Sitter space
We prove that any weakly acausal curve Γ in the boundary of anti‐de Sitter (2+1)‐space is the asymptotic boundary of two spacelike K‐surfaces, one of which is past‐convex and the other future‐convex, for every K∈(−∞,−1). The curve Γ is the graph of a quasisymmetric homeomorphism of the circle if and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of topology 2018-06, Vol.11 (2), p.420-468 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We prove that any weakly acausal curve Γ in the boundary of anti‐de Sitter (2+1)‐space is the asymptotic boundary of two spacelike K‐surfaces, one of which is past‐convex and the other future‐convex, for every K∈(−∞,−1). The curve Γ is the graph of a quasisymmetric homeomorphism of the circle if and only if the K‐surfaces have bounded principal curvatures. Moreover in this case a uniqueness result holds.
The proofs rely on a well‐known correspondence between spacelike surfaces in anti‐de Sitter space and area‐preserving diffeomorphisms of the hyperbolic plane. In fact, an important ingredient is a representation formula, which reconstructs a spacelike surface from the associated area‐preserving diffeomorphism.
Using this correspondence we then deduce that, for any fixed θ∈(0,π), every quasisymmetric homeomorphism of the circle admits a unique extension which is a θ‐landslide of the hyperbolic plane. These extensions are quasiconformal. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1753-8416 1753-8424 1753-8424 1753-8416 |
DOI: | 10.1112/topo.12058 |