Feasibility of a shorter Goal Attainment Scaling method for a pediatric spasticity clinic — The 3-milestones GAS

• Published in: Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine 2017-07, Vol.60 (4), p.249-257
• Main Authors: Krasny-Pacini, A, Pauly, F, Hiebel, J, Godon, S, Isner-Horobeti, M.-E, Chevignard, M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Botulinum toxin; Botulinum Toxins - administration & dosage; Child; Children; Family; Feasibility Studies; Female; Goal Attainment Scaling; Goal setting; Goals; Humans; Internal Medicine; Male; Muscle Spasticity - drug therapy; Muscle Spasticity - etiology; Muscle Spasticity - rehabilitation; Neurotoxins - administration & dosage; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Physics; Rehabilitation - standards
• ISSN: 1877-0657; 1877-0665
• DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.01.005

Abstract Background Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is a method for writing personalized evaluation scales to quantify progress toward defined goals. It is useful in rehabilitation but is hampered by the experience required to adequately “predict” the possible outcomes relating to a particular goal before treatment and the time needed to describe all 5 levels of the scale. Here we aimed to investigate the feasibility of using GAS in a clinical setting of a pediatric spasticity clinic with a shorter method, the “3-milestones” GAS (goal setting with 3 levels and goal rating with the classical 5 levels). Secondary aims were to (1) analyze the types of goals children's therapists set for botulinum toxin treatment and (2) compare the score distribution (and therefore the ability to predict outcome) by goal type. Methods Therapists were trained in GAS writing and prepared GAS scales in the regional spasticity-management clinic they attended with their patients and families. The study included all GAS scales written during a 2-year period. GAS score distribution across the 5 GAS levels was examined to assess whether the therapist could reliably predict outcome and whether the 3-milestones GAS yielded similar distributions as the original GAS method. Results In total, 541 GAS scales were written and showed the expected score distribution. Most scales (55%) referred to movement quality goals and fewer (29%) to family goals and activity domains. Conclusion The 3-milestones GAS method was feasible within the time constraints of the spasticity clinic and could be used by local therapists in cooperation with the hospital team.