Loading…
The largest aftershock: How strong, how far away, how delayed?
Proposed in the 1950's, Båth's law states that the largest aftershock has a magnitude that is typically 1.2 less than that of the mainshock. Thirty years of the global earthquake catalog allow us to extend Båth's law in time, space and focal mechanism. On average, reverse faults have...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geophysical research letters 2012-02, Vol.39 (4), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Proposed in the 1950's, Båth's law states that the largest aftershock has a magnitude that is typically 1.2 less than that of the mainshock. Thirty years of the global earthquake catalog allow us to extend Båth's law in time, space and focal mechanism. On average, reverse faults have a smaller magnitude and distance from the mainshock to largest aftershock than strike‐slip faults. The distribution of the time intervals between mainshocks and their largest aftershocks obeys power law, but with a somewhat faster rate of decay than for aftershocks, in general. This implies that the largest aftershocks are more likely to occur earlier rather than later in a given sequence of aftershocks.
Key Points
The largest aftershock is larger in size for reverse than for strike slip event
The largest aftershock is the closest to the mainshock for reverse events
Space and size patterns are in agreement with static stress changes |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
DOI: | 10.1029/2011GL050604 |