Loading…
Estimating model- and sampling-related uncertainty in large-area growth predictions
•We estimated both model- and sampling-related variance of growth predictions at a regional level.•This estimation required a bootstrap variance estimator for hybrid inference.•Sampling error was the most important source of variance in short-term predictions.•In long-term predictions, the model con...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecological modelling 2018-12, Vol.390, p.62-69 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •We estimated both model- and sampling-related variance of growth predictions at a regional level.•This estimation required a bootstrap variance estimator for hybrid inference.•Sampling error was the most important source of variance in short-term predictions.•In long-term predictions, the model contribution was as important as that of the sampling.•The mortality sub-model was the model component that accounted for the greatest share of variance in long-term predictions.
Estimating uncertainty in forest growth predictions is essential to support large-area policies and decisions. The aim of this study was to estimate model and sampling uncertainties at a regional level. To do this, we generated forest growth predictions for three ecotypes in the Bas-Saint-Laurent region of Quebec, Canada. Predictions were generated using the ARTEMIS growth model that allows for stochasticity in some of the sub-models. We used a bootstrap hybrid estimator to estimate the variances arising from the model and the sampling. Moreover, the variance due to the model was further decomposed to determine which dynamic sub-model induced the greatest share of variance. Results revealed that sampling accounted for most of the variance in short-term predictions. In long-term predictions, the model contribution turned out to be as important as that of the sampling. The variance decomposition per sub-model indicated that the mortality sub-model induced the highest variability in the predictions. These results were consistent for the three ecotypes. We recommend that efforts in variance reduction focus on increasing the sample size in short-term predictions and on improving the mortality sub-model in long-term predictions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0304-3800 1872-7026 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.10.011 |