Loading…
Rhopalomastix is only the second ant genus known to live with armoured scale insects (Diaspididae)
Rhopalomastix is a myrmicine ant distributed throughout tropical parts of Asia, with almost nothing known about its biology. Its closest relative Melissotarsus in Africa is the only ant genus known to live with diaspidid scale insects inside their nests, and to rely on these for food. Twelve colonie...
Saved in:
Published in: | Insectes sociaux 2019-05, Vol.66 (2), p.273-282 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Rhopalomastix
is a myrmicine ant distributed throughout tropical parts of Asia, with almost nothing known about its biology. Its closest relative
Melissotarsus
in Africa is the only ant genus known to live with diaspidid scale insects inside their nests, and to rely on these for food. Twelve colonies of four species of
Rhopalomastix
were sampled from seven tree genera in Singapore. Ants chewed tunnels under live bark, and these were occupied by many diaspidids belonging to five genera; at least two species are known to also live freely on the outside of trees. Inside ant nests, only a few diaspidids secreted their trademark shields. The association with the pupillarial
Fiorinia
is unexpected, since they have fewer secretions that can be used as food by the ants.
Rhopalomastix
and
Melissotarsus
workers share several morphological adaptations, including powerful mandibles and silk glands, but while the legs of
Melissotarsus
are modified for traction during tunnelling, those of
Rhopalomastix
are not. Consequently,
Rhopalomastix
workers are able to walk outside their tunnels, but they behaved timidly except in
R. murphyi
. Silk was used to repair damaged tunnels, and the spinning behaviour resembled that of
Melissotarsus
. Host trees do not gain protection from the ants against leaf herbivores, so they apparently get no benefits from this mutualism. We discuss the likely economic impact of this parasitic lifestyle, especially on fruit trees. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-1812 1420-9098 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00040-019-00686-z |