Loading…

GRAIL, LLR, and LOLA constraints on the interior structure of the Moon

The interior structure of the Moon is constrained by its mass, moment of inertia, and k2 and h2 tidal Love numbers. We infer the likely radius, density, and (elastic limit) rigidity of all interior layers by solving the inverse problem using these observational constraints assuming spherical symmetr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical research letters 2016-08, Vol.43 (16), p.8365-8375
Main Authors: Matsuyama, Isamu, Nimmo, Francis, Keane, James T., Chan, Ngai H., Taylor, G. Jeffrey, Wieczorek, Mark A., Kiefer, Walter S., Williams, James G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The interior structure of the Moon is constrained by its mass, moment of inertia, and k2 and h2 tidal Love numbers. We infer the likely radius, density, and (elastic limit) rigidity of all interior layers by solving the inverse problem using these observational constraints assuming spherical symmetry. Our results do not favor the presence of a low rigidity transition layer between a liquid outer core and mantle. If a transition layer exists, its rigidity is constrained to 43−9+26 GPa, with a preference for the high rigidity values. Therefore, if a transition layer exists, it is more likely to have a rigidity similar to that of the mantle (∼70 GPa). The total (solid and liquid) core mass fraction relative to the lunar mass is constrained to 0.0098−0.0094+0.0066 and 0.0198−0.0049+0.0026 for interior structures with and without a transition layer, respectively, narrowing the range of possible giant impact formation scenarios. Key Points The interior structure of the Moon is constrained using the observed mass, moment of inertia, and Love numbers The probability distributions of the interior structure parameters are provided The presence of a low rigidity transition layer at the base of the mantle is not required
ISSN:0094-8276
1944-8007
DOI:10.1002/2016GL069952