Comparative adverse cardiac effects of pimobendan and benazepril monotherapy in dogs with mild degenerative mitral valve disease: a prospective, controlled, blinded, randomized study

• Published in: Journal of veterinary internal medicine 2007-07, Vol.21 (4), p.742-753
• Main Authors: Chetboul, V, Lefebvre, H.P, Sampedrano, C.C, Gouni, V, Saponaro, V, Serres, F, Concordet, D, Nicolle, A.P, Pouchelon, J.L
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: adverse effects; Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; angiotensins; Animals; Benzazepines - adverse effects; Benzazepines - therapeutic use; Blood Pressure - drug effects; Body Weight - drug effects; Dog Diseases - drug therapy; Dogs; Double-Blind Method; drugs; Echocardiography - drug effects; Echocardiography - veterinary; enzyme inhibitors; heart diseases; Inotrope; Life Sciences; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - drug therapy; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - veterinary; Myocardium - pathology; Phosphodiesterase III inhibitor; Pyridazines - adverse effects; Pyridazines - therapeutic use; randomized clinical trials; Time Factors
• ISSN: 0891-6640; 1939-1676
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2007.tb03016.x

Background: Pimobendan (PIMO) is an inodilator that may have some beneficial effects in canine degenerative mitral valve disease (MVD). However, little information is available about its cardiac effects in dogs without systolic myocardial dysfunction. Hypothesis: Compared to benazepril (BNZ), an angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor, PIMO may worsen valve regurgitation in early canine MVD. Animals: Twelve Beagles with asymptomatic MVD were randomized into 2 groups (n = 6) receiving BNZ or PIMO at dosages of 0.25 mg/kg PO q24h and q12h respectively, for 512 days. Methods: The study followed a blinded, randomized, prospective, and parallel group design. After day 512, the dogs were necropsied, and cardiac histopathology was performed in a blinded manner. Results: A significant treatment effect was observed as soon as day 15 with increased systolic function in the PIMO group by comparison to baseline value as assessed by fractional shortening (P < .0001) and tissue Doppler variables (P= .001). Concurrently, the maximum area and peak velocity of the regurgitant jet signal increased (P < .001), whereas these variables remained stable in the BNZ group. Histologic grades of mitral valve lesions were more severe in the PIMO group than in the BNZ group. Moreover, acute focal hemorrhages, endothelial papillary hyperplasia, and infiltration of chordae tendinae with glycosaminoglycans were observed in the mitral valves of dogs from the PIMO group but not in those of the BNZ group. Conclusions and Clinical Importance: PIMO has adverse cardiac functional and morphologic effects in dogs with asymptomatic MVD. Additional investigation in dogs with symptomatic MVD is now warranted.