Evaluation of vaccination strategies to control an avian influenza outbreak in French poultry production networks using EVACS tool

• Published in: Preventive veterinary medicine 2020-11, Vol.184, p.105129-105129, Article 105129
• Main Authors: Hautefeuille, Claire, Azzouguen, Billal, Mouchel, Simon, Dauphin, Gwenaëlle, Peyre, Marisa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Avian influenza; Evaluation; France; Life Sciences; Poultry; Santé publique et épidémiologie; Vaccination
• ISSN: 0167-5877; 1873-1716
• DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105129

•Higher poultry population immunity coverage was reached using hatchery vaccination.•Hatchery vaccination protocols provided the highest benefit-cost ratio.•Vaccination strategies including only the most at-risk population were not efficient.•Strategies including the highest number of birds offered the highest benefit-cost ratio.•EVACS tool provides relevant evidences for decision makers to design AI vaccination strategies. France recently faced two epizootic waves of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in poultry (H5N6 in 2015–2016 and H5N8 in 2016–2017), mainly in the fattening duck production sector. Vaccination against avian influenza (AI) is currently not authorised in France even though its potential benefits were discussed during these epizootic events. The objective of this work was to evaluate the potential efficiency of different vaccination strategies that could be applied against AI in France. The EVACS tool, which is a decision support tool developed to evaluate vaccination strategies, was applied in several French poultry production sectors: broiler, layer, turkey, duck and guinea fowl. EVACS was used to simulate the performance of vaccination strategies in terms of vaccination coverage, immunity levels and spatial distribution of the immunity level. A cost-benefit analysis was then applied based on EVACS results to identify the most efficient strategy. For each sector, vaccination protocols were tested according to the production type (breeders/production, indoor/outdoor), the integration level (integrated/independent) and the type of vaccine (hatchery vaccination using a recombinant vaccine/farm vaccination using an inactivated vaccine). The most efficient protocols for each sector were then combined to test different overall vaccination strategies at the national level. Even if it was not possible to compare vaccination protocols with the two vaccines types in “foie gras” duck, meat duck and guinea fowl production sectors as no hatchery vaccine currently exist for these species, these production sectors were also described and included in this simulation. Both types of vaccination (at hatchery and farm level) enabled protective immunity levels for the control of AI, but higher poultry population immunity level was reached (including independent farms) using hatchery vaccination. We also showed that hatchery vaccination was more efficient (higher benefit-cost ratio) than farm vaccination. Sufficient and homogeneously spatially distribu