Prevalence and intensity of Alaria alata (Goeze, 1792) in water frogs and brown frogs in natural conditions

• Published in: Parasitology research (1987) 2015-12, Vol.114 (12), p.4405-4412
• Main Authors: Patrelle, Cécile, Portier, Julien, Jouet, Damien, Delorme, Daniel, Ferté, Hubert
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Ecology, environment; Europe; Flukes; Frogs; Health; Health aspects; Host-parasite relationships; Human health and pathology; Immunology; Infectious diseases; Larva - parasitology; Life Sciences; Meat - parasitology; Medical Microbiology; Microbiology; Microbiology and Parasitology; Original Paper; Platyhelminths - classification; Platyhelminths - genetics; Platyhelminths - isolation & purification; Platyhelminths - physiology; Prevalence; Prevalence studies (Epidemiology); Ranidae - parasitology; Statistics; Trichinella - genetics; Trichinella - isolation & purification; Trichinella - physiology
• ISSN: 0932-0113; 1432-1955
• DOI: 10.1007/s00436-015-4680-z

In the last 15 years, the mesocercariae of Alaria alata have frequently been reported in the wild boar during routine Trichinella inspections made compulsory for the trade of venison meat in Europe. If these studies have focused primarily on mesocercariae isolated from meat, few works have been done so far to understand the circulation of the parasite in natural conditions especially in the intermediate hosts. This study focuses on the second intermediate hosts of this parasite assessing the suitability of two amphibian groups—brown frogs and water frogs sensu lato —for mesocercarial infection on an area where A. alata has already been identified in water snails and wild boars. During this study, both groups showed to be suitable for mesocercarial infection, with high prevalence and parasite burdens. Prevalence was higher in the brown frog group (56.9 versus 11.54 % for water frogs) which would indicate that it is a preferential group for infection on the study area, though reasons for this remain to be investigated. No significant difference among prevalences was observed between tadpoles and frogs. This study, the first focusing on A. alata in these amphibians in Europe, provides further information on circulation of this parasite in natura.