Loading…

Multiplate® evaluation of acetylsalicylic acid efficacy in carotid surgery: routine and genetic influencing factors

Essentials Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is prescribed to patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We measured ASA efficacy during CEA by Multiplate® and searched for influencing factors. Most patients scheduled for CEA and treated by ASA are sensitive to this therapy. Influencing genomic f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis 2018-03, Vol.16 (3), p.583-591
Main Authors: Roullet, S., Labrouche, S., Carrie, C., Auque, H., Berard, X., Freyburger, G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Essentials Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is prescribed to patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We measured ASA efficacy during CEA by Multiplate® and searched for influencing factors. Most patients scheduled for CEA and treated by ASA are sensitive to this therapy. Influencing genomic factors are involved in ASA metabolism and in platelet function modulations. Summary Background Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is recommended before, during and after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The efficacy of ASA is influenced by numerous biological and genotypic factors. Objectives To determine the biological efficacy of ASA by using the Multiplate® method, and to explore the biological parameters and genomic factors influencing this efficacy. Methods This descriptive cross‐sectional study included all patients scheduled for CEA between January 2012 and April 2013. Multiplate® tests were performed at day 0 and day 30. A set of 66 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 38 genes or DNA regions were selected and studied along with phenotypic parameters by the use of hierarchical clustering (HC) for multidimensional data management. Results Fifty‐five patients receiving ASA were analyzed. Of the patients, 95% were found to be sensitive to ASA, with values under the threshold of normality (400 AU min–1). However, there were notable differences in residual aggregation among subjects over a wide range. HC revealed four subclusters comprising three categories of parameters: (i) routine and functional parameters – in ASA‐treated patients, the ASPItest was highly linked to the ADPtest, to platelet count, and, to a lesser extent, to fibrinogen and hematocrit; (ii) polymorphisms in genes involved in ASA absorption and in the arachidonic acid pathway (ABCB1 and COX‐1); and (iii) polymorphisms in genes modulating basal platelet function, i.e. TBXA2R, ADRA2A, PEAR1, ITGA2 and ITGB1. Conclusion Most patients treated with ASA before CEA were sensitive to it, according to Multiplate® ASPItest results. Genomic factors influencing this efficacy are SNPs involved in ASA absorption and metabolic pathway, and in modulations in basal platelet function.
ISSN:1538-7933
1538-7836
1538-7836
DOI:10.1111/jth.13943