Loading…

Creep-fatigue behaviour of an AISI stainless steel at 550 °C

In the past, a lot of experimental studies have been devoted to creep-fatigue interactions in austenitic stainless steels. Tests have been carried mainly at temperatures of at least 600 °C and at high applied strains, which are supposed to be the most damaging. The present work is dedicated to mecha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nuclear engineering and design 2004-08, Vol.232 (3), p.219-236
Main Authors: Sauzay, M., Mottot, M., Allais, L., Noblecourt, M., Monnet, I., Périnet, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the past, a lot of experimental studies have been devoted to creep-fatigue interactions in austenitic stainless steels. Tests have been carried mainly at temperatures of at least 600 °C and at high applied strains, which are supposed to be the most damaging. The present work is dedicated to mechanical tests, TEM observations and lifetime predictions at 550 °C which corresponds to the real industrial temperature in Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactors. It is shown that if pure fatigue test results are close to those performed at 600 °C, some of the creep-fatigue results are different, particularly for small applied strains which correspond once more to the industrial conditions. In the 0.25–0.3% strain amplitude range, the stress is larger with hold time than without whatever is the hold time up to 5 h. The numbers of cycles to failure are greatly reduced and no saturation with the hold time is observed, contrary to higher temperature results. The stress–strain behaviour is discussed considering several high temperature mechanisms such as ageing, recovery and viscoplasticity and using TEM observations and stress partitioning into kinematic, isotropic and thermal stresses. Finally, a simple linear damage accumulation model is applied to the 550 °C and 600 °C tests, using the measured stresses. The stress dependence on hold time can partly explain the observed failure results on fatigue life.
ISSN:0029-5493
1872-759X
DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2004.05.005