Comparison of Cross-Education and Global Training Effects in Adults and Youth After Unilateral Strength Training

• Published in: Journal of strength and conditioning research 2022-08, Vol.36 (8), p.2121-2131
• Main Authors: Chaouachi, Anis, Ben Othman, Aymen, Chaouachi, Mehdi, Hechmi, Abderraouf, Farthing, Jonathan P., Granacher, Urs, Behm, David G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adults; Elbow; Isometric; Life Sciences; Sports training; Strength training
• ISSN: 1064-8011; 1533-4287
• DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003766

ABSTRACTChaouachi, A, Ben Othman, A, Chaouachi, M, Hechmi, A, Farthing, JP, Granacher, U, and Behm, DG. Comparison of cross-education and global training effects in adults and youth after unilateral strength training. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2020—Youth strength training research examining contralateral, homologous (cross-education), and heterologous (global training) effects after unilateral training have provided mixed results and the relationship to adults has not been compared. The objective was to compare adult and youth cross-education and global training effects on dominant and nondominant limb testing. Initially, 15 men and 15 prepubertal boys volunteered for each unilateral chest press (CP), handgrip training, and control groups (n = 89). Individuals trained their dominant limb 3 times per week for 8 weeks and had their dominant and nondominant limbs tested for CP and leg press 1 repetition maximum (1RM), handgrip, knee extension and flexion, and elbow extension and flexion maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs). Adult CP training gains were significantly greater than youth with lower-body testing (p = 0.002–0.06), whereas youth CP training gains exceeded adults with upper-body tests (p = 0.03–0.07). Training specificity was evident with greater CP 1RM increases with CP vs. handgrip training for both youth (p < 0.0001) and adults (p < 0.0001). Handgrip training elicited greater gains in handgrip MVICs compared with other strength tests (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, only contralateral CP 1RM showed a training advantage for unilateral CP over unilateral handgrip training. Adults showed greater gains with lower-body testing, whereas youth showed greater gains with upper-body testing.