Loading…

Bordeaux red wines display variable intrinsic ability to support Brettanomyces bruxellensis growth

Red wines constitute a major production in Bordeaux vineyards but to ensure the quality of these wines, winemakers should limit the development of the spoilage yeast Brettanomyces bruxellensis. Therefore, the growth of five representative strains of B. bruxellensis in 53 sulphite-free Bordeaux red w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food control 2024-01, Vol.155, p.110067, Article 110067
Main Authors: Miranda, Julie, Miot-Sertier, Cécile, Olazabal, Laura, Albertin, Warren, Richard, Tristan, Da Costa, Grégory, Rouger, Caroline, Dols-Lafargue, Marguerite
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Red wines constitute a major production in Bordeaux vineyards but to ensure the quality of these wines, winemakers should limit the development of the spoilage yeast Brettanomyces bruxellensis. Therefore, the growth of five representative strains of B. bruxellensis in 53 sulphite-free Bordeaux red wines was examined and differences between them were found regarding the ability to support the yeast growth. Thanks to a notation method and unsupervised classification analysis, we classified the wines according to their “permissiveness”. The key factors modulating the permissiveness score were the wine ethanol content, the yeast strain and the wine itself (domain, vintage or batch). The pH had little effect. The wine composition analysis (Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1H NMR) analysis of 43 compounds) did not enable to find the molecules responsible for the wine permissiveness. •Bordeaux wines display heterogeneous tolerance towards B. bruxellensis.•A scoring of wine permissiveness is proposed and evaluated.•The effect of five wine-related factors on the permissiveness is examined.•Alcohol has a more direct impact than pH.
ISSN:0956-7135
1873-7129
DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.110067