Loading…

Advantages and limitations of different methods to determine the optimum formulation in surfactant–oil–water systems: A review

The optimum formulation in a surfactant–oil–water (SOW) system is defined as the physicochemical situation at which the surfactant adsorbed at the interface exhibits exactly equal interactions for both oil and water. Identifying the optimum formulation of SOW systems is crucial in various industrial...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of surfactants and detergents 2024-01, Vol.27 (1), p.5-36
Main Authors: Marquez, Ronald, Ontiveros, Jesús F., Barrios, Nelson, Tolosa, Laura, Palazzo, Gerardo, Nardello‐Rataj, Véronique, Salager, Jean Louis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The optimum formulation in a surfactant–oil–water (SOW) system is defined as the physicochemical situation at which the surfactant adsorbed at the interface exhibits exactly equal interactions for both oil and water. Identifying the optimum formulation of SOW systems is crucial in various industrial applications, ranging from pharmaceuticals to cosmetics and to petroleum issues like dehydration and enhanced oil recovery. Multiple techniques are available to identify the optimum formulation, often with its own advantages and limitations. In this comprehensive review, we provide an in‐depth analysis of the systematic use of formulation scans to identify the optimum formulation in SOW systems. We critically assess different methods, including conventional ones, such as phase behavior observation, determination of the minimum interfacial tension from equilibrated systems, and the localization of the minimum emulsion stability using formulation scans. We also mention a new promising technique that can be applied in practice, such as oscillating spinning drop interfacial rheology (OSDIR) as well as others that allow an understanding of some structural features of the domains present in the surfactant‐rich phase in SOW systems. Among these methods, dynamic light scattering (DLS), small angle scattering (SAXS and SANS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), X‐ray microcomputed tomography (Micro‐CT), and differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), can be found in the literature. Finally, we discuss potentially unusual behaviors that can appear in complex systems, thus providing guidance on the selection of the most suitable method tailored to the specific application. Representation of the optimum formulation found within the bicontinuous microemulsion triphasic zone and the macroemulsion phenomenology linked when the system is agitated.
ISSN:1097-3958
1558-9293
DOI:10.1002/jsde.12703