Introducing eccentric cycling during a multidisciplinary weight loss intervention might prevent adolescents with obesity from increasing their food intake: The TEXTOO study

•Eccentric cycling training is an effective modality in adolescents with obesity.•Eccentric cycling might avoid food intake increase in response to weight loss.•Eccentric cycling seems efficient and well tolerated in boys and girls with obesity. The present study compared the appetite responses to a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physiology & behavior 2020-02, Vol.214, p.112744-112744, Article 112744
Main Authors: Thivel, David, Julian, Valérie, Miguet, Maud, Pereira, Bruno, Beaulieu, Kristine, Finlayson, Graham, Richard, Richard, Duclos, Martine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Adolescent Behavior - psychology
Appetite
Bicycling - psychology
Child
Eating - psychology
Eccentric cycling
Energy intake
Exercise - physiology
Exercise - psychology
Female
Food reward
Humans
Life Sciences
Male
Obesity - psychology
Pediatric obesity
Weight Reduction Programs - methods
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Eccentric cycling training is an effective modality in adolescents with obesity.•Eccentric cycling might avoid food intake increase in response to weight loss.•Eccentric cycling seems efficient and well tolerated in boys and girls with obesity. The present study compared the appetite responses to an inpatient eccentric vs. concentric cycling training programs in adolescents with obesity. 24 adolescents with obesity (12–16yrs; Tanner 3–4) followed a 12-week multidisciplinary intervention (Phase1), after which they were randomized to concentric (CON) or eccentric (ECC) training for 12 weeks (Phase2). Assessment of anthropometrics, body composition (DXA), aerobic power (VO2max), energy (EI) and macronutrient intake, food reward, and subjective appetite were performed at baseline, and after Phase1 (T1) and Phase2 (T2). Body mass, BMI, and fat mass (FM%) decreased in both groups (p 
ISSN:0031-9384
1873-507X
DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112744