First-generation teeth in nonmammalian lineages: Evidence for a conserved ancestral character?

• Published in: Microscopy research and technique 2002-12, Vol.59 (5), p.408-434
• Main Authors: Sire, Jean-Yves, Davit-Beal, Tiphaine, Delgado, Sidney, Van Der Heyden, Christine, Huysseune, Ann
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Biological Evolution; Dentition; evolution; first-generation teeth; hatchlings; larvae; Life Sciences; Microscopy, Electron; Odontogenesis; Tooth - diagnostic imaging; tooth development; Ultrasonography; Vertebrates
• ISSN: 1059-910X; 1097-0029
• DOI: 10.1002/jemt.10220

The present study focuses on the main characteristics of first‐generation teeth (i.e., the first teeth of the dentition to develop in a given position and to become functional) in representatives of the major lineages of nonmammalian vertebrates (chondrichthyans, actinopterygians, and sarcopterygians: dipnoans, urodeles, squamates, and crocodiles). Comparative investigations on the LM and TEM level reveal the existence of two major types of first‐generation teeth. One type (generalized Type 1) is characterized by its small size, conical shape, atubular dentine, and small pulp cavity without capillaries and blood vessels. This type is found in actinopterygians, dipnoans, and urodeles and coincides with the occurrence of short embryonic periods in these species. The other type assembles a variety of first‐generation teeth, which have in common that they represent miniature versions of adult teeth. They are generally larger than the first type, have more complex shapes, tubular dentine, and a large pulp cavity containing blood vessels. These teeth are found in chondrichtyans, squamates, and crocodiles, taxa which all share an extended embryonic period. The presence in certain taxa of a particular type of first‐generation teeth is neither linked to their phylogenetic relationships nor to adult body size or tooth structure, but relates to the duration of embryonic development. Given that the plesiomorphic state in vertebrates is a short embryonic development, we consider the generalized Type 1 first‐generation tooth to represent an ancestral character for gnathostomes. We hypothesize that an extended embryonic development leads to the suppression of tooth generations in the development of dentition. These may still be present in the form of rudimentary germs in the embryonic period. In our view, this generalized Type 1 first‐generation teeth has been conserved through evolution because it represents a very economic and efficient way of building small and simple teeth adapted to larval life. The highly adapted adult dentition characteristic for each lineage has been possible only through polyphyodonty. Microsc. Res. Tech. 59:408–434, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.