Loading…
Electoral rules, strategic entry and polarization
How does electoral rule disproportionality affect the structure of the party system (i.e. the number and the policy platforms of the competing parties)? By studying a model where both party entry and platform choice are endogenous we are able to provide a unified theory: An increasing electoral rule...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of public economics 2019-10, Vol.178, p.104065, Article 104065 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | How does electoral rule disproportionality affect the structure of the party system (i.e. the number and the policy platforms of the competing parties)? By studying a model where both party entry and platform choice are endogenous we are able to provide a unified theory: An increasing electoral rule disproportionality exhibits: a) a first-order negative effect on platform polarization, b) a second-order negative effect on the number of parties (as polarization decreases, centrist parties are squeezed between other contenders and prefer not to enter), and c) an additional third-order negative effect on polarization via the reduction of the number of parties. We then conduct a laboratory experiment and strongly confirm the theoretical predictions of the model.
•We build a model of electoral competition with endogenous entry and platform choice under alternative electoral rules.•We highlight potential channels through which electoral rules simultaneously affect the number of competing parties and polarization.•We provide experimental evidence in line with our theoretical predictions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0047-2727 1879-2316 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104065 |