Loading…

Electoral rules, strategic entry and polarization

How does electoral rule disproportionality affect the structure of the party system (i.e. the number and the policy platforms of the competing parties)? By studying a model where both party entry and platform choice are endogenous we are able to provide a unified theory: An increasing electoral rule...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of public economics 2019-10, Vol.178, p.104065, Article 104065
Main Authors: Bol, Damien, Matakos, Konstantinos, Troumpounis, Orestis, Xefteris, Dimitrios
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:How does electoral rule disproportionality affect the structure of the party system (i.e. the number and the policy platforms of the competing parties)? By studying a model where both party entry and platform choice are endogenous we are able to provide a unified theory: An increasing electoral rule disproportionality exhibits: a) a first-order negative effect on platform polarization, b) a second-order negative effect on the number of parties (as polarization decreases, centrist parties are squeezed between other contenders and prefer not to enter), and c) an additional third-order negative effect on polarization via the reduction of the number of parties. We then conduct a laboratory experiment and strongly confirm the theoretical predictions of the model. •We build a model of electoral competition with endogenous entry and platform choice under alternative electoral rules.•We highlight potential channels through which electoral rules simultaneously affect the number of competing parties and polarization.•We provide experimental evidence in line with our theoretical predictions.
ISSN:0047-2727
1879-2316
DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104065