Loading…
Ubiquitinâproteasome-dependent muscle proteolysis responds slowly to insulin release and refeeding in starved rats
The central role of the Ubiquitinâproteasome system in the loss of skeletal muscle protein in many wasting conditions has been well established. However, it is unclear what factors are responsible for the suppression of this system during periods of protein gain. Thus, the aim of these studies was...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of physiology 2003-02, Vol.546 (3), p.765 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The central role of the Ubiquitinâproteasome system in the loss of skeletal muscle protein in many wasting conditions has
been well established. However, it is unclear what factors are responsible for the suppression of this system during periods
of protein gain. Thus, the aim of these studies was to examine the short-term effects of insulin release and nutrients on
skeletal muscle protein turnover in young rats starved for 48 h, and then infused intravenously with amino acids (AA), or
fed an oral diet. Forty-eight hours of starvation (i.e. prolonged starvation in young rats) decreased muscle protein synthesis
and increased proteasome-dependent proteolysis. Four-hour AA infusion and 4 h of refeeding increased plasma insulin release
and AA concentrations, and stimulated muscle protein synthesis, but had no effect on either total or proteasome-dependent
proteolysis, despite decreased plasma corticosterone concentrations. Both muscle proteasome-dependent proteolysis and the
rate of ubiquitination of muscle proteins were not suppressed until 10 h of refeeding. The temporal response of these two
measurements correlated with the normalised expression of the 14-kDa E2 (a critical enzyme in substrate ubiquitination in
muscle) and the expression of the MSS1 subunit of the 19S regulatory complex of the 26S proteasome. In contrast, the starvation-induced
increase in mRNA levels for 20S proteasome subunits was normalised by refeeding within 24 h in muscle, and 6 h in jejunum,
respectively. In conclusion, unlike protein synthesis, skeletal muscle proteasome-dependent proteolysis is not acutely responsive
in vivo to insulin, AA, and/or nutrient intake in refed starved rats. This suggests that distinct and perhaps independent mechanisms
are responsible for the nutrient-dependent regulation of protein synthesis and Ubiquitinâproteasome-dependent proteolysis
following a prolonged period of catabolism. Furthermore, factors other than the expression of Ubiquitinâproteasome pathway
components appear to be responsible for the suppression of skeletal muscle proteasome-dependent proteolysis by nutrition. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3751 1469-7793 |
DOI: | 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.032367 |