Loading…
The New Anterior Less Invasive Crescentic Incision for Living Donor Nephrectomy
Objectives: Living-donor nephrectomy is a devoted procedure performed in a healthy individual; for these procedures, it is essential to complete the surgery with the lowest possible risk and morbidity and allow donors to regain their normal daily activity. To minimize anatomic and physiologic damage...
Saved in:
Published in: | Experimental and clinical transplantation 2020-10, Vol.18 (5), p.543-548 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objectives: Living-donor nephrectomy is a devoted
procedure performed in a healthy individual; for these
procedures, it is essential to complete the surgery with
the lowest possible risk and morbidity and allow
donors to regain their normal daily activity. To
minimize anatomic and physiologic damage, we
modified a surgical technique. Here, we report our
experiences with the new anterior less invasive
crescentic donor nephrectomy technique.
Metarials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated
728 donor nephrectomy patients who had the new
anterior less invasive cresentic incision (n = 224), the
classic open (n = 431), or the laparoscopic living-donor
nephrectomy (n = 73) procedures. Demographic
characteristics, preoperative and postoperative
parameters, acute renal graft dysfunction, and firstyear
graft and patient survival rates were compared
between groups.
Results: During the operation, the new cresentic
incision living-donor nephrectomy allowed a safe and
comfortable position for the patient and the
anesthesiologist. Also, it procures safe access
especially for grefts with multiple vessels. Patients had
lower pain scores (P = .010), shorter hospital stays
(2.25 vs 3.49 days) than those who received the classic
open living-donor nephrectomy. Patients who
received laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy had
significantly longer mean operation time (P = .016) and warm ischemia time (P ≤ .001) than those who had
the new cresentic incision technique. All groups
showed similar rates of first-year survival and delayed
graft dysfunction.
Conclusions: The new anterior less invasive cresentic
incision open-donor nephrectomy approach is a safe,
comfortable, effective, and less invasive modification
of the living donor nephrectomy. Also, it procures safe
access for grefts with multiple vessels. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1304-0855 2146-8427 |
DOI: | 10.6002/ect.2020.0370 |