Loading…

Leveraging Crowdsourced Activity Information for Transit Stations Flow Estimation

Transit flow estimation and prediction requires capturing the complex urban mobility patterns and activity-travel behavior dynamics governing the travel demand. Most approaches rely on data from mobility providers such as smartcard data and travel surveys, which are seldom available for research pur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE access 2024, Vol.12, p.167518-167529
Main Authors: Vitello, Piergiorgio, Connors, Richard D., Viti, Francesco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Transit flow estimation and prediction requires capturing the complex urban mobility patterns and activity-travel behavior dynamics governing the travel demand. Most approaches rely on data from mobility providers such as smartcard data and travel surveys, which are seldom available for research purposes. Recently, emerging data-driven approaches based on crowdsourced data from mobile devices have gained great interest. These data can be a powerful, easy to collect and widespread source of information, and can be especially useful in areas where traditional transit data is not available or is characterized by low granularity. This work shows the opportunity for leveraging a special type of information, the Google Popular Times (GPT), to estimate passenger demand at stations. We build upon a previously developed data-driven framework, TransitCrowd, which estimates the number of passengers entering and exiting a station from the GPT data of the same station. We show that using GPT information of nearby activities improves the estimation and prediction results. We test and compare different Machine Learning approaches and identify the models that provide more robust results. Our methodology is applied to 185 stations from two different cities: New York and Washington D.C. and are validated using two months of transit count data showing transferability of the models.
ISSN:2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3494012