Cortical patch basis model for spatially extended neural activity

• Published in: IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering 2006-09, Vol.53 (9), p.1740-1754
• Main Authors: Limpiti, T., Van Veen, B.D., Wakai, R.T.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Algorithms; Anisotropy; Brain Mapping - methods; Brain modeling; Cerebral Cortex - physiology; Computer Simulation; Cortical bases; cortical patches; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods; Electroencephalography; Electroencephalography - methods; Evoked Potentials - physiology; extended sources; Filtering algorithms; Hemodynamics; Humans; Inverse problems; Magnetoencephalography - methods; Maximum likelihood estimation; maximum-likelihood; MEG inverse problem; minimum variance beamformer; Models, Neurological; Neuroimaging; Signal processing algorithms; Spatial resolution; Studies; Testing
• ISSN: 0018-9294; 1558-2531
• DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2006.873743

A new source model for representing spatially distributed neural activity is presented. The signal of interest is modeled as originating from a patch of cortex and is represented using a set of basis functions. Each cortical patch has its own set of bases, which allows representation of arbitrary source activity within the patch. This is in contrast to previously proposed cortical patch models which assume a specific distribution of activity within the patch. We present a procedure for designing bases that minimize the normalized mean squared representation error, averaged over different activity distributions within the patch. Extension of existing algorithms to the basis function framework is straightforward and is illustrated using linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) spatial filtering and maximum-likelihood signal estimation/generalized likelihood ratio test (ML/GLRT). The number of bases chosen for each patch determines a tradeoff between representation accuracy and the ability to differentiate between distinct patches. We propose choosing the minimum number of bases that satisfy a constraint on the normalized mean squared representation accuracy. A mismatch analysis for LCMV and ML/GLRT is presented to show that this is an appropriate strategy for choosing the number of bases. The effectiveness of the patch basis model is demonstrated using real and simulated evoked response data. We show that significant changes in performance occur as the number of basis functions varies, and that very good results are obtained by allowing modest representation error