First In-Core Measurement Results Obtained with the Innovative Mobile Calorimeter CALMOS inside the OSIRIS Material Testing Reactor

• Published in: IEEE transactions on nuclear science 2014-08, Vol.61 (4), p.1951-1962
• Main Authors: Carcreff, Hubert, Salmon, Laurent, Courtaux, Cédric
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Atmospheric models; Calibration; Calorimetry; Devices; Displacement; Graphite; Heating; Heating rate; in-core measurements; Inductors; Irradiation; Mathematical models; Mobile communication; nuclear heating; Nuclear reactor components; OSIRIS reactor; Probes; Radiation effects; Temperature measurement
• ISSN: 0018-9499; 1558-1578
• DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2014.2302079

Nuclear heating rate inside an MTR has to be known in order to design and to run irradiation experiments which have to fulfill target temperature constraints. This measurement is usually carried out by calorimetry. An innovative calorimetric system, CALMOS, has been studied and built in 2011 for the 70MWth OSIRIS reactor operated by CEA. Thanks to a new calorimetric probe, associated to a specific displacement system, it provides measurements along the fissile height and above the core. Development of the calorimetric probe required manufacturing and irradiation of mock-ups in the ex-core area, where nuclear heating rate does not exceed 2 W.g -1 . The calorimeter working mode, the different measurement procedures, main modeling and ex-core experimental results have been already presented in previous papers. In this paper, we present in-core results obtained from 2011 to 2013 with the final device. For the first time, this new experimental measurement system was operated in several experimental locations, with nominal in-core thermal hydraulic conditions, nominal neutron flux and nuclear heating rate up to 6 W.g -1 (in graphite). After a brief presentation of the displacement system specificities, first nuclear heating distributions are presented and discussed. The Finite Element model of the calorimeter was upgraded in order to match calculated temperatures with measured ones. This "validated" model allowed to estimate a Kc factor which tends to correct small nonlinearities when heating rate is calculated from the "calibration method". A comparison is made between nuclear heating rates determined from "calibration" and "zero methods". In addition, an evaluation of the global uncertainty associated to the measurements is d- tailed. Finally, a comparison is made with available measurements obtained from previous calorimeters.