Loading…

A combined /spl Delta/T+/spl Delta/F beam loading compensation scheme for power saving

The NLC low frequency (S and L band) rf linacs are heavily loaded by a beam of about 130 ns in macropulse length (90 bunches) and a current up to 2.75 Amps. Beam loading generates a large energy spread along the bunch train. For these linacs, the bunch train is much shorter than the filling time of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zenghai Li, Miller, R., Farkas, D., Raubenheimer, T., Tang, H., Yeremian, D.
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The NLC low frequency (S and L band) rf linacs are heavily loaded by a beam of about 130 ns in macropulse length (90 bunches) and a current up to 2.75 Amps. Beam loading generates a large energy spread along the bunch train. For these linacs, the bunch train is much shorter than the filling time of these linac structures, and the energy of the beam drops approximately linearly with time during the pulse as a result of beam loading. For such a case, there are two natural choices for beam loading compensation, /spl Delta/T (which achieves compensation by injecting the beam before the accelerator structure is full) and /spl Delta/F (which compensates by having some accelerator sections at f/sub 0//spl plusmn//spl Delta/F). There are, however, disadvantages with these methods: non-local compensation in the /spl Delta/F method (except using many short /spl Delta/F sections) and low efficiency in the /spl Delta/T method due to short filling time and amplitude modulation required for compensation. In this paper, we discuss a combined /spl Delta/T+/spl Delta/F method. In this scheme, the filling time of the structure is optimized for /spl Delta/T compensation for phase-I operation. In phase-II operation, /spl Delta/F sections are used to compensate the extra 50% beam loading due to higher current. Simulations have shown that up to 30% of power can be saved by using this method.
DOI:10.1109/PAC.1997.749777