Health Intervention Evaluation Using Semantic Explainability and Causal Reasoning

As serious public health problems require complex responses, health interventions often involve multiple components implemented by groups including policy experts, social workers, and health practitioners. The success or failure of an intervention depends on many different factors, ranging from avai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE access 2020, Vol.8, p.9942-9952
Main Authors: Brenas, Jon Hael, Shaban-Nejad, Arash
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adaptation models
Biological system modeling
Causal graphs
Cognition
explainable AI
Intervention
intervention evaluation
logic models
Ontologies
Ontology
Public health
public health program evaluation
Public healthcare
Qualitative analysis
Semantics
Sociology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:As serious public health problems require complex responses, health interventions often involve multiple components implemented by groups including policy experts, social workers, and health practitioners. The success or failure of an intervention depends on many different factors, ranging from available resources to characteristics of the targeted public health issue and community to the complex mechanics relating cause and effects of the actions performed. In this paper, we present a novel formal methodology to evaluate public health interventions, policies, and programs. Our method uses the theory of change (TOC) approach along with logic models that define the intervention under consideration to generate a causal diagram and an ontology-based inference model for causal description. The resulting causal diagram will then be compared to existing knowledge and data to determine whether the intervention is coherent, internally consistent and its goals are achievable in the allotted time with the resources provided. The contextual knowledge and semantics provided by the ontology will generate a more explainable, understandable, and trustworthy approach to compare and assess different interventions based on their shared goals. Depending upon the quality and quantity of data available we perform a mix of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the interventions. This study uses smoking cessation interventions to showcase the proposed methodology in action.
ISSN:2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2964802