Growth processes leading to a large or small adult size

• Published in: Annals of human biology 2001-05, Vol.28 (3), p.319-327
• Main Authors: Gasser, T., Sheehy, A., Molinari, L., Largo, R. H.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Adults; Age Factors; Anthropometry; Biological anthropology; Biology; Body Constitution - physiology; Body Height - physiology; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Growth - physiology; Height; Human body; Humans; Humerus - growth & development; Ilium - growth & development; Infant; Leg - growth & development; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Measurement; Puberty - physiology; Reference Values; Sex Characteristics; Switzerland; Time Factors
• ISSN: 0301-4460; 1464-5033
• DOI: 10.1080/030144601300119124

Background: The way in which a large size in anthropometric variables is achieved is a longstanding problem, since the pubertal spurt shows statistically and clinically little association with adult size (mostly studied for height). By analysing longitudinal growth of groups of subjects with a large or a small adult size separately for height, leg and sitting height, and bihumeral and biiliac width, we studied this problem in some detail. Of interest are growth patterns specific for these variables and for boys or girls. Methods: The data consist of 120 boys and 112 girls followed longitudinally from 4 weeks until adulthood. Statistically, structural average velocity curves were computed for each variable and each subgroup separately for comparison. This velocity curve represents the average intensity and the average tempo of growth. Since the area under the velocity curve is adult size, differences in the growth process can be visualized. Results: Both sexes show similar patterns in reaching a small or large adult size. The different variables, however, show marked differences. Only for legs is the pubertal spurt delayed for the large groups (with additional gains in prepubertal years). For sitting height and biiliac width, a slightly elevated velocity all along development (after 2 years) leads to a larger size and for bihumeral width the size of the pubertal peak is decisive. Conclusions: The steering of growth to a certain target size is qualitatively similar for boys and girls, but quite different for different anthropometric variables. This leads to questions about endocrinological control for various parts of the body and differential bone growth in development. Hintergrund: Die Art, in der anthropometrische Variable die Erwachsenengröße erreichen, ist ein seit langer Zeit bestehendes Problem, da der puberale Spurt statistisch und klinisch nur geringe Assoziationen zur Erwachsenengröße zeigt (am häufigsten untersucht für die Körperhöhe). Wir untersuchten dieses Problem detailliert durch die Analyse des longitudinalen Wachstums von Probandengruppen mit großer oder geringer Erwachsenengröße jeweils für Körperhöhe, Beinlänge, Sitzhöhe sowie Ellbogenbreite und Beckenbreite. Dabei waren die Wachstumsmuster speziell für diese Variablen für Jungen und Mädchen von Interesse. Methodik: Die Daten stammen von 120 Jungen und 112 Mädchen, die von der vierten Lebenswoche bis zum Erwachsenenalter longitudinal untersucht wurden. Statistisch wurden die strukturellen