Loading…

Why using international comparative math and science achievement data from TIMSS is not helpful

The authors explain their argument that using TIMSS data "is a distracting and misleading approach to assessing science and maths teaching in any group of countries with widely differing characteristics. Such global comparative assessments generally serve no productive purpose, because very lit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Educational forum (West Lafayette, Ind.) Ind.), 2003, Vol.67 (3), p.250-257
Main Authors: Holliday, William G, Holliday, Berchie W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The authors explain their argument that using TIMSS data "is a distracting and misleading approach to assessing science and maths teaching in any group of countries with widely differing characteristics. Such global comparative assessments generally serve no productive purpose, because very little useful information can be discovered and reasonably applied to existing school programs." The article doubts the comparability of the cultural factors which are unique for each country, "such as different national languages, social norms, cultural prides, ... educational goals, and school curricula" so that methodological correctness cannot be achieved. One popular test item from TIMSS is used to demonstrate the arguments. (DIPF/Bi.).
ISSN:0013-1725
1938-8098
DOI:10.1080/00131720309335038