Imitation in International Relations: Analogies, Vicarious Learning, and Foreign Policy

Do states learn from other states' experiences in international relations? This is the expectation of prominent theories. But empirical research indicates that foreign policy learning is based overwhelmingly on direct experience. I argue that vicarious learning has not been uncovered because we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International interactions 2003-07, Vol.29 (3), p.237-267
Main Author: Goldsmith, Benjamin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analogies
Empirical research
Foreign Policy
Imitations
International relations
Learning
Political Psychology
Russia
Russian Federation
Ukraine
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Do states learn from other states' experiences in international relations? This is the expectation of prominent theories. But empirical research indicates that foreign policy learning is based overwhelmingly on direct experience. I argue that vicarious learning has not been uncovered because we have not known where to look: there has been no well-developed theory leading to falsifiable expectations. Here I suggest a theory and test it on data for foreign policy beliefs and analogies used by Ukrainian and Russian elites. The results indicate that learning from vicarious success, or imitation, has a strong impact on beliefs following a major failure. This has implications for foreign policy decision making and for concepts of interests and change in systemic theories of international relations.
ISSN:0305-0629
1547-7444
DOI:10.1080/03050620304593