Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Evaluate Participation in Costa Rica's Program of Payments for Environmental Services

The Costa Rican Program of Payments for Environmental Services provides financial compensation to forest owners for the environmental services generated by their forests. This program offers a unique opportunity to evaluate the impacts of direct incentive payments on conservation. In order to measur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of sustainable forestry 2009-05, Vol.28 (3-5), p.343-367
Main Authors: Arriagada, Rodrigo A, Sills, Erin O, Pattanayak, Subhrendu K, Ferraro, Paul J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
case studies
conservation programs
Costa Rica
data analysis
econometrics
ecosystem services
forest economics
forests
iterative field research
landowners
opportunity costs
participation
participatory econometrics
payments for environmental services
program evaluation
research methods
surveys
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Costa Rican Program of Payments for Environmental Services provides financial compensation to forest owners for the environmental services generated by their forests. This program offers a unique opportunity to evaluate the impacts of direct incentive payments on conservation. In order to measure the causal effect of this program on outcomes of interest, it is fundamental to understand the factors that influence enrollment in the program. Economic theory suggests that opportunity costs are key, but many factors may determine and mediate the influence of these costs. This article reports findings from an integrated qualitative and quantitative approach to this question. Within an iterative field research framework, information was gathered through (a) semistructured interviews with government officials and forestry professionals, (b) case studies of participant and nonparticipant forest landowners based on in-depth interviews, field visits, and a review of records, and (c) a quantitative survey of participant and nonparticipant landowners. The semistructured interviews and case studies provide important insights that can be incorporated into the quantitative analysis, specifically by identifying potential determinants of program participation and land use change. Hypotheses about the relationship between program participation and the opportunity costs of participation are confirmed using both approaches.
ISSN:1054-9811
1540-756X
DOI:10.1080/10549810802701192