Controversial advertisement executions and involvement on elaborative processing and comprehension

Previous explorations of the effect of controversial/shock appeals in advertising have been confounded by using different advertisements in controversial and non-controversial execution conditions or by not controlling the influence of attitude toward the advertisement. Therefore, the experiment pre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of marketing communications 2008-09, Vol.14 (4), p.293-313
Main Authors: Huhmann, Bruce A., Mott-Stenerson, Beth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
controversial advertisement execution
offensive advertising
provocative advertisement
resource-matching perspective
shock appeal
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Previous explorations of the effect of controversial/shock appeals in advertising have been confounded by using different advertisements in controversial and non-controversial execution conditions or by not controlling the influence of attitude toward the advertisement. Therefore, the experiment presented here seeks to determine the effect that a controversial advertisement execution has on elaborative processing and brand message comprehension when potential contaminating influences are held constant in the controversial and non-controversial execution conditions. Results demonstrate that controversial advertisement executions increase elaboration (i.e. the number of cognitive responses and ratings of elaborative processing) regardless of the level of product involvement. A cross-over interaction reveals that higher product involvement subjects better comprehend a controversial advertisement execution, but lower product involvement subjects better comprehend a non-controversial advertisement execution. Comprehension results are consistent with the resource-matching perspective. The resource-matching perspective holds that there is an upside-down U-shaped relationship between processing outcomes and cognitive resources required to successfully process an advertisement execution, such that information processing is optimized when required resources match the resources that one has made available for advertisement processing. The study did not show any differences in processing controversial advertisement executions across gender or ethnic identity (i.e. Hispanic or non-Hispanic white).
ISSN:1352-7266
1466-4445
DOI:10.1080/13527260802141413