Loading…
A regulatory stress test to-do list: Transparency and accuracy
Regulatory stress tests use forecasts of bank performance over hypothetical multi-year stress scenarios to set minimum regulatory capital requirements. Notwithstanding their popularity among US and European regulators, little is known about the accuracy of supervisory stress test models. Regulators...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of risk management in financial institutions 2018-03, Vol.11 (2), p.132-147 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Regulatory stress tests use forecasts of bank performance over hypothetical multi-year stress scenarios to set minimum regulatory capital requirements. Notwithstanding their popularity among US and European regulators, little is known about the accuracy of supervisory stress test models. Regulators keep the details of their stress test models confidential, inhibiting an independent verification of regulatory model performance. Using data from the 2008 financial crisis, this paper demonstrates how the lack of transparency and model inaccuracy have the potential to create costly misallocations of banking resources. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1752-8887 1752-8895 1752-8895 |
DOI: | 10.69554/GUEU4467 |