Loading…

Dissociative and Nondissociative Pathways in the endo to exo Isomerization of Tetramethyl-o-xylylene Complexes of Ruthenium and Osmium, ML3{η4-o-C6Me4(CH2)2} (M = Ru, L = PMe3; M = Os, L = PMe3, PMe2Ph). Formation of Hexamethylbenzene-1,2-diyl Complexes by Ligand Addition to the exo-Osmium Complexes

Treatment of the (η6-hexamethylbenzene)ruthenium(II) and -osmium(II) salts [M(O2CCF3)L2(η6-C6Me6)]PF6 (M = Ru, L = PMe3; M = Os, L = PMe3, PMe2Ph) in the presence of L with KO-t-Bu gives exclusively the endo- (tetramethyl-o-xylylene)metal(0) complexes ML3{η4-endo-o-C6Me4(CH2)2}, endo- 1, -2, and -3,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Organometallics 1998-08, Vol.17 (17), p.3784-3797
Main Authors: Bennett, Martin A, Bown, Mark, Hockless, David C. R, McGrady, John E, Schranz, Harold W, Stranger, Robert, Willis, Anthony C
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Treatment of the (η6-hexamethylbenzene)ruthenium(II) and -osmium(II) salts [M(O2CCF3)L2(η6-C6Me6)]PF6 (M = Ru, L = PMe3; M = Os, L = PMe3, PMe2Ph) in the presence of L with KO-t-Bu gives exclusively the endo- (tetramethyl-o-xylylene)metal(0) complexes ML3{η4-endo-o-C6Me4(CH2)2}, endo- 1, -2, and -3, respectively, in high yield; these are protonated by an excess of triflic acid (CF3SO3H, TfOH) to give the (η6-hexamethylbenzene)metal(II) salts [ML3(η6-C6Me6)](OTf)2 [M = Ru, L = PMe3 (4); M = Os, L = PMe3 (5); M = Os, L = PMe2Ph (6)). Complexes 4−6 revert to endo- 1−3 on treatment with KO-t-Bu, whereas for M=Ru, L=PMe2Ph the complexes [ML3(η6-C6Me6)]2+ and [M(O2CCF3)L2(η6-C6Me6)]+/L react with KO-t-Bu to give exclusively the exo isomer, Ru(PMe2Ph)3{η4-exo-o-(CH2)2C6Me4} (exo- 7). The endo complexes 1−3 are converted quantitatively into the corresponding exo isomers in toluene in the temperature range 65−106 °C, the process being first order in endo complex. Kinetics studies in the presence of PMe3 (for 1 and 2) or PMe2Ph (for 3) indicate that two pathways are available:  one depends on initial dissociation of L and proceeds through a bis(ligand) intermediate or intermediates, e.g., ML2{endo-o-C6Me4(CH2)2} and ML2{exo-o-(CH2)2C6Me4}, and the other does not. The dissociative mechanism is predominant for M = Ru, L = PMe3, whereas the nondissociative or direct mechanism plays the dominant, possibly exclusive, role for M = Os, L = PMe3. The osmium(0) compound exo- 2 adds PMe3 irreversibly to give the σ-bonded (hexamethylbenzene-1,2-diyl)osmium(II) complex Os(PMe3)4{κ2-o-(CH2)2C6Me4} (8), whereas the corresponding PMe2Ph derivative 9 is in equilibrium with exo- 3 and PMe2Ph and cannot be isolated; the ruthenium(0) compound exo- 1 is inert toward PMe3. Density functional calculations on the model compounds ML3{η4-exo-o-(CH2)2C6H4} and ML4{κ2-o-(CH2)2C6H4}(M = Ru, Os; L = PH3) correctly reflect the observed stability order Os > Ru for the diyl complex but predict the latter to be more stable than the η4 complex for both elements. In this case, the usual computational simplification of replacing a tertiary phosphine by PH3 is probably unjustified. The molecular structures of the η4 complexes endo- 3, exo- 3, and exo- 1 and of the diyl complex 8 have been determined by X-ray crystallography. The endo- to exo-o-xylylene isomerizations are compared with the intramolecular migrations that occur in Fe(CO)3(η4-polyene) and Cr(CO)3(η6-substituted-naphthalene) complexes.
ISSN:0276-7333
1520-6041
DOI:10.1021/om9804226