From Single-Party to Electoral Authoritarian Regimes: The Institutional Origins of Competitiveness in Post-Cold War Africa

Scholarship on authoritarianism has become concerned with variation in electoral authoritarian outcomes, observed in terms of the competitiveness of elections. Simultaneously, there has been a growing focus on the role of authoritarian institutions, and especially political parties, in explaining au...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Comparative politics 2015-10, Vol.48 (1), p.126-151
Main Author: Morse, Yonatan L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Authoritarianism
Coercion
Competitive authoritarianism
Competitiveness
Hegemony
Incumbents
Opposition parties
Political elections
Political parties
Voting
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Scholarship on authoritarianism has become concerned with variation in electoral authoritarian outcomes, observed in terms of the competitiveness of elections. Simultaneously, there has been a growing focus on the role of authoritarian institutions, and especially political parties, in explaining authoritarian survival. This article links these two perspectives by focusing on the subset of formerly single-party regimes in Africa that transitioned to electoral authoritarianism. The article highlights differences in party institutionalization and patterns of social incorporation as key aspects that help explain the competitiveness of elections. Through typological theorizing, ten countries are compared along measures of party capacity, economic performance, opposition strength, and external actor pressure. The study aims to highlight variation in institutional development in African cases and to illuminate the underpinnings of electoral authoritarian regimes.
ISSN:0010-4159
DOI:10.5129/001041515816075141