Loading…
Comparison between Kalman filter and Robust filter for vehicle handling dynamics state estimation
This paper explores design methods for a vehicle handling dynamics state estimator based on a linear vehicle model. The state estimator is needed because there are some states of the vehicle that cannot be measured directly, such as sideslip velocity, and also some which are relatively expensive to...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This paper explores design methods for a
vehicle handling dynamics state estimator based on a
linear vehicle model. The state estimator is needed
because there are some states of the vehicle that cannot
be measured directly, such as sideslip velocity, and also
some which are relatively expensive to measure, such
as roll and yaw rates. Information about the vehicle
states is essential for vehicle handling stability control
and is also valuable in chassis design evaluation.
The aim of this study is to compare the
performance of a Kalman filter with that of a robust filter,
under conditions which would be realistic and viable for
a production vehicle. Both filters are thus designed and
tested with reference to a higher order source model
which incorporates nonlinear saturating tyre force
characteristics. Also, both filters rely solely on
accelerometer sensors, which are simulated with
expected noise characteristics in terms of amplitude and
spectra.
As is widely known, the Kalman filter is a
stochastic filter whose design depends on the nominal
vehicle model and statistical information of process and
measurement noises. By contrast, the robust filter is
deterministic, formulated in terms of model parameter
uncertainties and the expected gain of process and
measurement noises. The objective of both filter designs
is to minimise the variance of the estimation error. Both
filters are designed to compensate the vehicle model
non-linearities, parameter uncertainties and other
modeling errors, which are represented in terms of
process and measurement noise covariances in Kalman
filter design and in terms of additive model uncertainties
in robust filter design.
The study shows that the robust filter offers
higher performance potential. The work concludes with
a discussion on the practical realisation of each method,
and gives recommendations for further research into a
single design methodology which combines the benefits
of both approaches. |
---|